Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2017 8:49:53 PM PST by daniel1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212; redleghunter; Springfield Reformer; kinsman redeemer; BlueDragon; metmom; boatbums; ...

http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Crowd%20controversy.PNG


2 posted on 01/23/2017 8:50:40 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
Notice the time stamp on this photo that ran in a BBC story on the inauguration. Is this the same picture CNN ran with?

4:20 PM in London, UK is
11:20 AM in Washington, DC

When did Trump get sworn in?

4 posted on 01/23/2017 9:00:58 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

The left photo at the Trump rally was taken early in the morning as people were arriving. It is not what I saw during the inauguration. Who knows who had more people. It is just great that Marxism got rejected and a big FU to CNN and their lies.


5 posted on 01/23/2017 9:03:46 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

Our local Fox Philadelphia morning news show was showing the comparison photo with 8 am vs 11:30 for Obama’s. But they purposely cut off the Trump time stamp....enlarged the pgoto enough that the 8 wasn’t showing. Then they go on to make a snide joke saying “gee I don’t see much of a difference...hahaha”


6 posted on 01/23/2017 9:04:47 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

Note that the CNN image is taken with the Capital building in the rear and does not show as much distance, while the others are looking forward, so it is hard to judge. But a lot of people do seem to have arrived by the time Trump gave his speech, even if the crowd may not be as large as Obama’s was.


7 posted on 01/23/2017 9:04:52 PM PST by daniel1212 ( Turn to the Lord Jesus as a damned and destitute sinner+ trust Him to save you, then follow Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
Pic from Marco Rubio. He is good for something.


8 posted on 01/23/2017 9:07:20 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

I bet there is a video feed that ran in each inauguration, maybe c-span, wherein one could capture matching timestamp pictures. at the swearing in, at the president’s speech, appears the mall was full. Same with both presidents. It is propaganda for media to ignorantly or intentionally mismatch photos to further their agenda.


9 posted on 01/23/2017 9:16:39 PM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

THey also required people in the more remote viewing areas to go through magnetometers for the first time, and this slowed the rate at which the crowd filled-in. So even a photo taken at the same time in Obama vs. Trump would not account for this difference.

The ground truth is in the Gigapixel posted by (even) CNN. It plainly shows the size of the crowd while Trump is speaking and those remote areas are full. Why is this even being argued about?


10 posted on 01/23/2017 9:17:53 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The MSM is heavily invested in marginalizing the Country’s support for Trump. The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.


20 posted on 01/23/2017 11:15:57 PM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

The two photos that CNN had side by side and the narrative that Trump’s inauguration was not well attended showed a blatant attempt to grasp at any straw to make a snide comment about DJT.

Any one who watched the swearing in ceremony knew that the sparsely populated picture was a blatant attempt to downplay the support shown for DJT.

Just one more nail in the coffin for CNN. CERTIFIED NOT NEWS.


23 posted on 01/24/2017 12:53:24 AM PST by greeneyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

They’ve been harping on the *Trump is not a legitimate president* since he got elected.

They’re just trying to further turn people ahd public opinion away from him.

It’s not working. The harder they push the more they damage their credibility. Since they no longer control what is fed to us because we have other sources for our news, they’ve lost their control and power.

Too bad for them.

They just keep continuing to expose themselves for the liars they are.


28 posted on 01/24/2017 4:26:58 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

The media, particularly CNN remains focused on a irrelevant issue.

Yes, more Liberals go to where crowds are going, they are the party that loves the mobs. It goes with a mob mentality. Conservatives are more individuals, and tend much less to favor going to where the crowds will be.


32 posted on 01/24/2017 6:25:09 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212
"I saw a new Reuters article entitled "Crowd controversy: The making of an Inauguration Day photo ," which reported that the popular images to the left and right of the CNN images ( taken from this panorama view ), were taken at different times, the one on the right of President Barack Obama's first inauguration was taken at 1:27 p.m., while Reuters reported that the other one showed U.S. President Donald Trump's inauguration at 12:01 p.m.

Meanwhile, the CNN image shows Trump giving his speech, and it appears a lot of people showed up. Perhaps the traffic was such that it caused this. Interesting comparison I would say."


Reuters Copy of the Tweeted Photo (L), Section CNN of Gigaplex Photo (Center), Unknown photo of Obambi Inauguration (R)

Reuters is lying with their cited photo times. . . both of them. Only the CNN photo above, which is taken from the Gigaplex photo taken while President Trump is giving his Inauguration Address (you can see him standing at the podium making the speech in the Gigaplex photo!), shows the correct crowd near 12 Noon on January 20, 2017. Since President Trump was sworn in starting at 12:02 PM on January 20, 2017 and started his Inaugural Address at approximately 12:04 PM, after hugging family members and shaking hands, and finishing the speech just sixteen minutes later at 12:20 PM, that source image is pretty well established in time to somewhere in that sixteen minute time frame.

The photo on the left, the one showing the sparse crowd has now been reliably shown to have FIRST been tweeted at 9:02 AM Eastern Time on January 20, 2012 as people were starting to arrive, filling in the available areas which had been covered by a white tarp.

34 posted on 01/24/2017 8:36:33 AM PST by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson