Posted on 01/18/2017 3:23:48 PM PST by RC one
The federal government has strictly limited the sale of firearm silencers for as long as James Bond and big-screen gangsters have used them to discreetly shoot enemies between the eyes.
Now the gun industry, which for decades has complained about the restrictions, is pursuing new legislation to make silencers easier to buy, and a key backer is Donald Trump Jr., an avid hunter and the oldest son of the president-elect, who campaigned as a friend of the gun industry.
The legislation stalled in Congress last year. But with Republicans in charge of the House and Senate and the elder Trump moving into the White House, gun rights advocates are excited about its prospects this year.
They hope to position the bill the same way this time not as a Second Amendment issue, but as a public-health effort to safeguard the eardrums of the nations 55 million gun owners. They even named it the Hearing Protection Act. It would end treating silencers as the same category as machine guns and grenades, thus eliminating a $200 tax and a nine-month approval process.
Its about safety, Trump Jr. explained in a September video interview with the founder of SilencerCo, a Utah silencer manufacturer. Its a health issue, frankly.
Violence prevention advocates are outraged that the industry is trying to ease silencer restrictions by linking the issue to the eardrums of gun owners. They argue the legislation will make it easier for criminals and potential mass shooters to obtain devices to conceal attacks.
They want the general public to think its about hearing aids or something, said Kristen Rand, the legislative director of the Violence Policy Center. Its both a silly and smart way to do it, I guess. But when the general public finds out whats really happening, there will be outrage.
The silencer industry and gun rights groups say critics are vastly overstating the dangers, arguing that Hollywood has created an unrealistic image of silencers, which they prefer to call suppressors. They cite studies showing that silencers reduce the decibel level of a gunshot from a dangerous 165 to about 135 the sound of a jackhammer and that they are rarely used in crimes.
But gun-control activists say silencers are getting quieter, particularly in combination with subsonic ammunition, which is less lethal but still damaging. They point to videos on YouTube in which silencers make high-powered rifles have no more sound than a pellet gun, according to one demonstrator showing off a silenced semiautomatic .22LR.
Youre still going to hear the gunfire from far away, said Knox Williams, president of the American Suppressor Association. These things are still incredibly loud.
Even with the restrictions, silencers have become one of the fastest-growing segments of the gun industry, which pushed accessories as gun sales level off. In 2010, there were 285,087 registered silencers. Last year: 902,085.
Rep. Matt Salmon, an Arizona Republican who regularly shoots with silencers, introduced the Hearing Protection Act in the House in 2015. A companion bill in the Senate was championed by Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho).
Though the bill never made it to committee hearings, it generated tremendous interest, becoming the third-most-viewed piece of legislation on Congresss website last year. (Top was the Democrat-led Assault Weapons Ban of 2015.)
Salmon is now retired. On Monday, the legislation was reintroduced in the House by Rep. Jeff Duncan, a South Carolina Republican, and Rep. John Carter, a Republican from Texas.
This legislation is about safety plain and simple, Duncan said in a statement. Im very active in sport shooting and hunting, and I cant tell you how better off the shooting sports enthusiasts would be if we had easier access to suppressors to help protect our hearing.
Hunters often shoot without hearing protection so they can hear prey moving. Many recreational shooters dont like wearing ear covers, which can be heavy and hot and in gun ranges lead to many conversations ending with, I cant hear you.
Silencers are also marketed as must-have attachments for high-powered rifles a tactical necessity that reduces recoil, thus improving aim.
Quiet guns are easier to shoot, the National Rifle Association says in its American Rifleman magazine. Try it.
Silencer stigma
Silencers were invented in 1908 by Hiram Percy Maxim, a graduate of MIT whose father invented the first fully automatic machine gun. The younger Maxim had a knack for reducing loud noises; he also contributed to the development of the automobile muffler.
I have always loved to shoot, but I never thoroughly enjoyed it when I knew that the noise was annoying other people, he said late in life. It occurred to me one day that there was no need for the noise. Why not do away with it and shoot quietly?
Maxim solved the problem in the bathtub. He noticed that the water swirled silently down the drain. What if the gases produced from firing a bullet could swirl that way, too? So Maxim put what he called a whirling tube on the end of a rifle. It successfully muffled the sound of the gunfire. Soon, the whirling tube was U.S. Patent No. 958,935, titled Silent Firearm.
In the 1930s, to curtail gang violence, Congress passed the National Firearms Act, putting restrictions and special taxes on machine guns and other high- powered weapons. Though they hadnt been used frequently in crimes, silencers were included anyway, reportedly out of concern that poachers would use them to steal food during the Great Depression.
Its a very strange tale, said Stephen Halbrook, a Virginia gun rights attorney who recently published a law review article about the history of silencers. If you think about it, if [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration] had been around then, they probably would have required people use these things.
Though silencers are now legal in 42 states, industry officials say the onerous and expensive task of buying them keeps gun owners, particularly hunters, from their preferred method of protecting their hearing.
They frequently point out that Britain, with some of the strictest gun laws in the world, has no restrictions on silencers for many types of firearms.
There isnt this negative stigma because of Hollywood that has suppressed pun intended the use of suppressors in this country, said Josh Waldron, the founder of SilencerCo, the Utah manufacturer.
Waldron started his company in 2008 after a career in photography, aiming to educate shooters about the benefits of silencers and to essentially hold buyers hands through the purchasing process. He sells about 18,000 silencers a month.
I want to create an environment where people understand the real purpose of these devices and that people arent using them for nefarious acts, he said.
Criminals and silencers
Silencer use in crimes is likely to be the focus of the legislative debate later this year.
Gun rights proponents and the silencer industry cite a study showing that in California, from 1995 to 2005, silencers appeared to be used for criminal purposes only 153 times in federal cases.
Suppressed firearms are clearly not the choice of criminals, according to a briefing paper by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, which is based in Newtown, Conn., and represents gun manufacturers. The fears and concerns about suppressor ownership and use are unfounded and have not been seen in the over 100-year history of suppressors.
Gun-control advocates contend that serious crimes are being committed with silencers on guns. Former police officer Christopher Dorner used silencers on an AR-15 and a 9mm handgun during two-day rampage in Los Angeles in 2013.
A serial killer in Vermont used a silencer in the killing of at least one of his 11 victims.
And the planner of a disrupted mass shooting targeting a Masonic temple in Milwaukee last year was charged with possessing a silencer, in addition to other weapons charges.
They wanted these things so they could kill quietly, said Rand, of the Violence Policy Center. The industry wants to make silencers less scary, but they cant.
Gun owners such as Trump Jr. cant understand why people like Rand dont get it.
In the video, after hes shown shooting several guns with silencers, Trump Jr. says they can help with getting little kids into the game.
Its just a great instrument, he says. Theres nothing bad about it at all.
I had an XDM .40 and sold it like an idiot a while back.
Yours looks like a dream.
If you want an SBR then by all means get the one you like.A SBR Thompson would be cool.
For example-
It took me 6 months of trial and advice on how to get a Ruger Mark 1 to cycle correctly using subsonic .22 cal 60gr rounds. Reduced power spring, tons of polishing on the bolt, etc.
Still hear the boom of the powder charge though.... I can’t wait to easily go out and buy, or just build my own “can”.
I guess I bought into the BS hype told to me by gunshop owners.
My mistake.
I’m thinking more of the AK route in an 8.5” Krink or 12.5” AK 105.
Friend of mine inherited a Thompson .45 from his grand-dad that was fully automatic. That thing had everybody’s attention at the range.
Suppressors are mandatory in much of Europe. If you hunt or shoot near high density populations, the suppression of the sound just makes good sense.
I have never understood the obsession over sound suppressed firearms, nor the reason for a NFA special license.
Most suppressors today are in the name of a trust, and the ATF doesn’t even know where they are stored. The idea of them charging into your home is a myth.
An AK 105 would be the ultimate high powered sub machinegun.Put a bump fire stock on your AK 105 SBR and have some fun!
I like your thinking and I may just do it.
I just love the 5.45 round.
“I guess I bought into the BS hype told to me by gunshop owners.”
Okay.
My prig is, I don’t like reading a firearm referred to as a weapon.
Sure, it can be a weapon.
Isn’t Reason 4. of Why Guns Are Better Than Wives, “You can’t put a silencer on your wife.”?
That was the argument here in Michigan leading up to the state becoming a "shall issue" state back around 2000.
Imagine their shock when several years later it was discovered that Michigan was already an "open carry" state and had been for almost forever. At that time, not even the LEO's I knew were aware of that law since no one had ever been observed exercising that right......
Funny, I was living in Michigan at that time and that is exactly what happened. The rag was the Grand Rapids Press. I still remember how livid I was reading that article.
Yep - hard to silence a gunshot - most still produce a "crack" noise, but at a comfortable level. Very small caliber can be made pretty quiet though - of course the racking of the slide still gives it away....
If I were getting a sup[resser I would mate it with a feather arms .22 and then the 9 mil. semi auto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.