Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: I need stock recommendations for defense contractors
1/12/17 | me

Posted on 01/12/2017 9:03:10 AM PST by spacejunkie2001

If anyone has any GOOD recommendations for stock purchase of defense contractors, preferably small to mid cap, that would be awesome.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: defensecontractors; defensespending; trumptransition; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Qwackertoo

I used to invest in single stocks, but I’m retired...and allergic to losing money.;-)

I love ETF’s.


21 posted on 01/12/2017 9:53:48 AM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Yep, i know that feeling. You get the big bag of gold falling out of the sky and you try to think coherantly....

Rarely happens though. To most gold corrupts.

Which then made me think of Trump, gold works for him.

I would invest in what Trump would invest in right now, he has the vision.


22 posted on 01/12/2017 9:54:13 AM PST by Daniel Ramsey (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“I own the defense ETF, ITA. It’s performed quite well.

Don’t like single company risk.”

***************

Good comment. The average investor is probably not inclined to do the research necessary to fully understand a company’s risk profile, performance metrics, financial health, or valuation ratios. Investing in individual companies is risky, even for those equipped with financial knowledge and analysis skills.


23 posted on 01/12/2017 9:57:19 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

In addition to the great recommendations above, you might try any company having to do with the rebuilding of our Navy.

http://www.govexec.com/features/magazine-features-top-200-contractors/2006/08/top-25-navy-contractors/22580/


24 posted on 01/12/2017 9:59:19 AM PST by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vic S

I will look into those as well.

What little investing I’ve been able to do has been token at best.

The 401k has been doing well.


25 posted on 01/12/2017 10:11:55 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

There are a few good trade rags out there which you should with regularity. Government Acquisitions and one called Procurement something or other...

**************

Be careful drawing conclusions from sources like this. Companies often win government contracts that are of uncertain value (i.e., multiple award, indefinite deliver and indefinite quantity vehicles, task order contracts, etc). The potential value may be much higher than the amount earned over the life of the contract. And contracts can be terminated by the government.

On the other side of the coin, a smart contractor knows how to “grow” the contract so as to make even more money than the contract was originally awarded for.

All that said, a lot of contracts wins is generally a good sign. The more the better.


26 posted on 01/12/2017 10:11:57 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Yep. Best contracts can be canceled. Been there. General Dynamics A-12. Former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney canceled it. 4K people laid off in one day at both General Dynamics and McDonnell Douglas.

But then contracts for on going support . . . back then were still going on for the old F-111. I’ve long since left and stayed home with kids instead.

Although in my years there the Air Force was much easier to please contract wise than was the Navy. They were hard to please. No missed deadlines. Hell to pay.


27 posted on 01/12/2017 10:15:57 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

As a broker, I can’t recommend anything to you since I don’t know anything about your goals, suitability, etc.

*****************

Very important point! A lot of people want to buy stocks to “make some money” without any consideration of their personal objectives, tolerance for risk, or knowledge of how complex investing really is.


28 posted on 01/12/2017 10:23:26 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

I think they are United Technologies. Or General Dynamics. I cannot remember which.


29 posted on 01/12/2017 10:24:13 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Very important point! A lot of people want to buy stocks to “make some money” without any consideration of their personal objectives, tolerance for risk, or knowledge of how complex investing really is.

I had a guy with very high income come to me. Poor bastard couldn't balance his check book. His credit was horrible....an MD no less.

Anyways before investing, we had to get him and his family's credit cards paid off, fees/fines paid off, lawyers paid off, malpractice insurance paid up, get his kids UGMAs set up, get his wifes ROTH set up, get them some Term life insurance, get them a Long term care policy, get their auto/home insurance up to a level to protect them from getting sued, buy an umbrella policy for him, close 5 bank accounts with cash sitting in them, get a trust attorney involved to set up a trust incase stay at home mom screws the pool boy, or the Doc runs off with his nurse intern, etc.

I mean, that guy was a mess, financially.

Don't buy any securities until you take care of your DEBT and family first. The best $2000.00 you can spend is with a tax/trust attorney and a CPA before ever coming to see me.

30 posted on 01/12/2017 10:28:11 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
...If you are a Qualified Institutional Buyer (>$5mm in account), or an Accredited investor (AI) (>$1mm in account)...

These definitions, both for Qualified Institutional Buyer and Accredited Investor are wrong.

The definitions are lengthy, but very specific. Google is your friend, as is Wikipedia. For instance, the term "accredited investor" is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Probably the easiest way to be an AI is to have net worth of more than $1 Million excluding a primary residence. It does not have to all be in one brokerage account. There are seven other ways to achieve this status. Most of them are geared toward trusts and institutions. Sufficient income will also put one into the AI class.

While I am not the most sophisticated financial person in the world, I personally, would be very wary of any advice coming from a source which can get a simple and easily verified definition so wrong.

31 posted on 01/12/2017 10:41:10 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I was just about to recommend going “all in” on LMT Jan 18 300 call options till you warned him this was a political web site. ;<) My philosophy has always been going out with your hair on fire.


32 posted on 01/12/2017 10:47:59 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
Firms have their own compliance. We don't sell AI/QIB/144a securities into any account unless the account has 2 commas in it. If the household has 7 accounts worth 300m each (2.1mm) that exceeds AI/QIB/144a, etc, but we have to have 15 damn signatures up and down the firm that verifies their status. Much better when 2 commas in the single account. Keeps MSRB/SEC/FINRA/internal auditors/external auditors/internal compliance away from me. Oh, and Wikipedia is not a good source for day to day business practices. Technically you are correct. You would be a good compliance officer that hassles us lowly traders and brokers ;)

and don't even get me started on Reg d15 SMMP regs.

33 posted on 01/12/2017 10:58:11 AM PST by DCBryan1 (No realli, moose bytes can be quite nasti!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

Thanks Bryan!


34 posted on 01/12/2017 11:29:03 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I get there will most likely be no dividend but it seems you could find one with growth potential....no?


35 posted on 01/12/2017 11:30:17 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

I come here and ask because there’s a lot of people in the know at FR.

Pretty dumb statement on your part.


36 posted on 01/12/2017 11:33:06 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin

good point clutch...


37 posted on 01/12/2017 11:34:05 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1

He’s just going out of his way to be insulting. You know, “anyone” that actually asks any questions HAS to be stupid, right?


38 posted on 01/12/2017 11:34:56 AM PST by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Opinions are like...... ......,Well you know the rest.

It always amuses me why some one would ask a financial question at a political message board, which is what this is.
Especially with the over load of excellent financial info on the WWW.

I amuse easily.


39 posted on 01/12/2017 11:41:03 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: spacejunkie2001

Caveat: I am NO expert. Not by a long shot

My take is yes one or more of these companies could have growth potential. It would be because they have a particular know how that resides in the talents of the principals and probably a product or process that they have patented. Garden variety suppliers and subcontractors are probably already well known and trade at full value (if they are even public companies. )

That means sifting through the prospects very carefully to judge which companies have the most promise. Also a close look at their balance sheets and profit and loss statements. They may great people and great ideas buy be bleeding out financially.


40 posted on 01/12/2017 11:41:13 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson