The question is whether the judicial system overreach and void the election.
I think the next big event is what happens in the Michigan supreme court. If they declare the election done with it will put an end to all this.
If they fail to act. It will then depend on Wisconsin getting its certification done by the 13th. Or PA or more specifically Philadelphia denying a recount.
I think it would be helpful if someone other than Trump requested a recount in states that Clinton won.
I happen to be finishing working on an advanced degree from The Electoral College, though, due to lack of nationwide accreditation, it appears the credit-hours are non-transferable...
There is no election to void.
Fifty State Legislatures appoint electors. How they do it is up to them.
Congress awarded itself 3 electors in 1960 (which should never have been permitted).
Anyway, the states are not required to hold elections, and they are not required to be bound by the results of any such events.
The President is chosen by a majority of the electors who have been appointed by the State Legislatures before December 19, 2016.
There's nothing for any court to void, cancel, or interfere with.
It's over.