Posted on 10/22/2016 7:37:45 AM PDT by ml/nj
Really, I don't recall her answering this way during any of the debates. Did her memory suddenly improve?
ML/NJ
She said....He said
Clinton’s excuses....Comey’s findings
(side by side audios)
https://twitter.com/bfraser747/status/789831323472977920
Great point, and one the moderators never touch.
e.g. Madam Secretary, you seem to have had a long term problem with your memory. Can you explain to us why ?
Ha! Good point.
oh hell naw, she knows everything when it comes to debates.
She’ll know everything if she becomes President too.
I don’t think so, but during the fitness for office, Trump should have blasted her on not being able to recall. Imagine a president that can’t remember what happened two years ago.
Selective memory.
HilLIARy had a set of answers rehearsed.
When she hear certain keywords, she launched into a prepared answer, not necessarily to the question asked.
You don’t suppose she lied to the feds do you? LOL! Did she open her mouth? She lied.
During the debates she was only under a moral “oath” to the People vs. a legal oath - she had no reason not to make up more lies.....when she couldn’t make up a good lie on the spot she instructed folks to “check my website for the lies we currently espouse”
That is a damn good point. Her memory comes back when
she isn’t under oath.
Hillary has no problem recalling (falsely) a speech she gave in Brazil years ago about her dream of open borders but she has a real problem recalling most everything when questioned about her emails and the people involved e.g. IT Specialist responsible for her illegal server Bryan Pagliano.
"On October 13, 2016, Judicial Watch released Clintons responses given under oath to 25 questions posed by Judicial Watch as ordered by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in separate litigation. The final question reads:"
"Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication."
Clintons response:
Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reasons set forth in General Objection No. 5. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that the word management is vague. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 insofar as it requests information related to alternate or replacement servers used after Secretary Clintons tenure as Secretary of State. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account.
When it's convenient for her SHE DOES NOT RECALL. Yet the emails show she directly addressed Pagliano for help.
She should shit out any lie she wanted. The moderator, nor MSM, or Snopes or Politifact whatever will call her on it.
They all are colluding criminals.
That’s a helluva good question!
Nope.
She is clever and scheming, but not stupid.
On national TV, a fatal mistake.
In the debates, she can answer with a lie other than “I don’t recall.” So, she just lied, or refused to answer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.