Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Apple Watch Series 2 review: It’s time to jump in
Computerworld ^ | Sep 27, 2016 9:04 AM PT | By Jonny Evans

Posted on 09/27/2016 2:59:44 PM PDT by Swordmaker

Faster, brighter, water resistant and far more versatile


I am not the world's best surfer, or passionate kayaker, but I quite
enjoy a gentle swim from time to time. Credit: Apple

I’ve been using my Apple Watch Series 2 for over a week. I thought I should share a few observations about my experience and try to explain why I think now is a good time for people who may have been curious about the product to take a look.

A little history

Introduced in a blaze of glory after years of speculation, Apple Watch quickly became King of the smartwatch scene. People liked its apps, full feature set and versatility, though people were turned off by application performance speed. Many of the criticisms were answered in watchOS 3 (the new Apple Watch software released this month), which is significantly faster than before on every edition of the Watch. And nearly all the criticisms (bar any aesthetic arguments) are answered in Series 2, apart from the need to make these things truly mobile with a network connection.

(Excerpt) Read more at computerworld.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: applepimp; applepinglist; applewatch2; icult; reviews; yawn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Swordmaker

Love my Apple watch. Makes traveling a breeze...not having to dig around for a boarding pass, or phone with boarding pass.

Love being able to answer calls when I can’t get to phone, check emails, texts, etc.


21 posted on 09/27/2016 7:56:33 PM PDT by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon
If you like it, great. Wear it in good health and don't worry about what anyone else thinks. It's just not for me.

Do you even have an iPhone?

22 posted on 09/27/2016 8:02:37 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Shanghai Dan

I’ve often wondered why you plague Apple Threads when you claim no interest in Apple products. I searched & there are lots of Free Republic threads containing the words ‘Apple Watch’ in the title — lots of interest.

Then I searched for threads containing ‘Pebble Time’ in the title and came up with “Nothing matched your criteria”. In other words ZERO hits with ZERO interest in your favorite product. So I guess you come to Apple threads out of loneliness. Quality attracts.


23 posted on 09/27/2016 11:50:03 PM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

You do realize the big thread that you and SW and the rest of the Apple zealots jumped all over me was an Android thread?

Physician, heal thyself!


24 posted on 09/28/2016 6:56:54 AM PDT by Shanghai Dan (I ride a GS scooter with my hair cut neat...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
I'm sticking with my timepiece.
25 posted on 09/28/2016 7:09:54 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Nope. Running Android N at the moment. Does that mean I don't get to have an opinion about how the Apple watch looks, or the smart watch concept generally? I read smart watch threads because they always seemed like a great idea back before they really existed. Now that they've been out for a while with different makes and models...just not seeing the utility as compared to the phones themselves. Playing around with a friend's Apple watch last year is what really convinced me the concept was was much more interesting than the reality. I keep looking for the game-changer, but so far no luck.

The Android smart watches have up until recently had the same issue of being tethered to a phone, rendering them more or less mere accessories. Now they say version 2.0 allows wireless Internet access and even full cellular capability without the phone, etc.; the smart watch is supposed to have fully entered the standalone device category. But so what? It's still by necessity a dinky little screen and the phones can basically do it all better anyway. No matter the make or model there's just no there there, IMO. I single out the Apple watch for being butt-ugly, but I wouldn't buy a more aesthetic smart watch at this point either.

26 posted on 09/28/2016 1:23:30 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Government employees and welfare recipients are both net tax consumers. Often for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson