Dangerous Faggot Tour - Milo's CRIB..! (highly customized bus)

YouTube.com ^ | Sept 14, 2016 | Milo Yiannopoulis

[gaijin]

Milo Yiannopoulis, provocative member of the alt-right and outspoken critic of feminism, Islam and political correctness, is current on a college speaking tour in the USA.

Enjoying some recent financial success, Milo upgraded his ride to a highly customized luxury bus that he permits you to tour in his latest video.

Freeps are invited to subscribe to his YouTube channel.

[Marie]

glad you liked it. :)

[Marie]

He doesn’t hate women. He hated FEMINISTS.

As do I. That’s how I even stumbled across the scamp. My his anti-feminist rants.

Don’t act like a liberal. You know that when Trump says ‘illegal immigrants’ he doesn’t mean all immigrants.

And when Milo rips up feminists, he’s not ripping up WOMEN.

I despise that dishonest bent in the left and I’m disappointed to see it here.

[sargon]

Thanks for being the voice of tolerance sanity amidst the hysterics. It's a thankless job most of the time.

Hate the sin, love the sinner.

The sins of gays are of no greater degree than the sins of straight people.

There's nothing like self-righteous zealots intent on defining the parameters of everyone else's Pursuit of Happiness.

Absent infringing on someone else's rights, people in America are free to commit the sins of their choice, at least in the privacy of their homes.

That pesky right to privacy obviously rubs some nanny-staters the wrong way. Trump gets it, though.

Vote Trump!

[Vision Thing]

That pesky right to privacy obviously rubs some nanny-staters the wrong way.

So what say you, oh tolerant PC one, about the homos putting bakers out of business for refusing to serve them?

[sargon]

So what say you, oh tolerant PC one, about the homos putting bakers out of business for refusing to serve them?

I say such "homos" are full of sh!t AND infringing on the baker's rights, and if such a case ever got to the USSC, they should rule in favor of the bakers.

I'm also pretty sure that homo Milo Y. would be supportive of the bakers rights in this case.

Vote Trump!

[DiogenesLamp]

I seen them all. He has no shame for sure. The man is on our side, let's let him be because he's a good tool to have in the box. I assure you he's done far more for the cause than I have or will ever be able to do. Promoting common sense conservatism with a sharp unfiltered grasp of historical facts is his strong suit. He's also quite eloquent while doing so.

I've been studying homosexuality since the 1990s and this is typical. As a group, homosexuals tend to be very intelligent and often very talented.

Of course i'm putting this into the category of "Genius" often equals "Nuts."

[DiogenesLamp]

If those same millennials 20 years from now still support socialism and the NWO they were taught in school, you’ll still have lost the culture war. You have to win those two battles first before you can confront the culture war - and those first two battles are still very winnable IMO. Win those 2, and the social war will be 10x easier.

I have been reading all your commentary since this thread began and I recognize the logic of your central argument.

However, you keep putting forth a lot of assumptions that imply a great deal of ignorance regarding history and fiscal/social dynamics.

You argue that it is possible to have Adam Smith without Edmund Burke, and I will point out to you that the concept of property itself is based on a morality foundation.

"Theft" is a moral issue first, and fiscal issue second. So too are the vast majority of fiscal issues once they are reduced down to their essence.

There are dozens of your points that I would like to challenge, but the discussion would get quite messy. Suffice it to say that I sort of agree with you to the extent that we have better directions at which to direct our fire.

I think that regarding Milo, most of us conservatives should adopt a position of "benign neglect."

[DiogenesLamp]

Again - win the youth on economics and nationalism, and as they grow up with kids and familes they will naturally become culturally conservatism. However, if they stay economically left and support the NWO - the social issues are a completely lost and tertiary cause.

People like to pigeonhole ideas into categories. They like the idea of something being simple to understand and easy to classify, rather than having vague outlines and fuzziness.

Often time this categorization is just a construct of their own mind, and that which they are categorizing is in fact just a section of a much larger continuity.

People want their answers in binary. They don't like trying to think with quantities better described as a math function.

The problem is, reality more closely resembles those difficult to mentally process function curves than it does a binary choice.

You are "binary-izing" this thing you are calling "social issues" and thereby doing your mental calculus with inaccurate simplified values replacing what you ought to be calculating with.

Now this methodology will work for some sections of the function, (In those areas where the function resembles your binary value) but it won't work across the entire spectrum of instantaneous values.

To simplify my point, if you think you can make a societal system work by focusing only on the fiscal aspects of it, you do not have an adequate grasp of how the system works.

We got into this mess by eschewing the moral hazards inherent in our economic policies. In my opinion, we are not likely going to get out of this mess without a crash. All we can do is stave it off for awhile, but unless we address the fundamental moral issues underpinning the problems that got us here, there will be no stable solution.

[DiogenesLamp]

I completely disagree. I think pre-material sex, divorce and extramarital sex have done far more to destroy Christianity and Western society than 2% of the population that is gay have done or ever will do.

And do you know how those things rose to their current level?

The answers lie in the past, and I have written many many essays on this topic, and as I implied in my previous comment, it would be inaccurate to point at any one thing and claim "Ah Hah! There is the cause."

But World War II and contemporary developments from that era, had a lot to do with it. You can even go further back to the Civil war as a contributing cause.

It's complicated.

[DiogenesLamp]

10 years ago, 30-40 was strongly against gay marriage. Today, 30-40 is like 70% in favor of gay marriage. 40 years ago, the majority of people over 30 thought abortion was wrong in all cases; today the majority is good with abortion in the first two trimesters (majority of abortions).

And how did this happen? What was the force that moved public opinion?

In order to fix something, you have to know how it got that way.

[miss marmelstein]

Again, you only know him through his videos. I follow him on Facebook and formerly on Twitter. He dislikes women as a majority of modern gay men do. Read his posts every day and see for yourself. Gay men didn’t always completely shut out the world of women but there has been a change in the weather because of gay liberation. Check out Camille Paglia’s “Vamps and Tramps” in which she has an essay about it.

I notice you conveniently left out his nasty stuff about obese people. Whenever I mention that, people clam up. I wonder why? Probably because...they don’t read him, they only watch his good-guy videos.

[DiogenesLamp]

You live in SC. You live a conservative lifestyle as you've said ad nauseum. I invite you here to NYC on Gay Pride Parade Day so you can see up front and personal (believe me, with your attitude, they'll make it upfront and personal) how charming, delightful, and warm and cozy it is. Bring your children or grandchildren; they'll enjoy it too!

Zombietime has photograpically documented such events, and those unfamiliar with them can see what they look like over at Zombie's website.

[numberonepal]

Of course i'm putting this into the category of "Genius" often equals "Nuts."

Don't get me started on the left-handed ones.

[DiogenesLamp]

I don't like "normal" parades (like New Years) so it's safe to say I like gay pride parades even less. But what are they actually doing to society? Not much. The destruction of the nuclear family even in my lifetime has been staggering. I know 10 couples in the last 5 years of my parents Church that the wife ran off after 20 to 40 years of marriage for another guy,leaving their children. I know 5x that many who have divorced. I know 10x as many as that who have cheated on their S/O. You may get more worried about a gay pride parade. I'm worried the moral right has been corrupted from within.

And how did this become so commonplace?

[miss marmelstein]

Good morning.

I like your idea about associating fatness with childbearing. Might be unconscious.

Of course, modern gay males - think Milo - are obsessed with body image because youth and beauty is what gets you endless ‘sex’. Get fat (unless you're a chubby-chaser) or grow old and you die of loneliness. It's why you see so many of them in gyms and the old bathhouses.

I have to laugh at freepers who think he's getting swathes of young people to vote for Trump. Even a cursory glance at his many college videos, show stupid kids crying and running in fear of him! The only millennials who will vote for Trump are conservative ones. As an aside, I don't think David Horowitz has changed too many college kids' minds.

[miss marmelstein]

Thanks but I don’t think a single person will bother looking at these. They don’t wanna know, they don’t gotta know. A few months ago, in NYC, they carried a banner proclaiming Republicans were a hate crime.

By the way, the conservative site, Gay Patriots, where I also post, loathes Trump and refuses to support him.

[Tax-chick]

I don't think David Horowitz has changed too many college kids' minds.

If David Horowitz can't change their minds, nothing will ... except time and being walloped upside the head by Real Life.

Good morning to you! It's another warm, humid day here, with a faint whiff of chicken farms.

[miss marmelstein]

Ah, the ageism has struck again as it does more and more frequently at FR! So, you admire and like Milo, are on lots of younger boards, but are not a follower of Milo on either (formerly) Twitter or Facebook. How convenient, as the Church Lady used to say.

You are not going to win gays over to Trump or the Republican party. It’s not worth the effort. You may get some fiscally conservative gays but most are too sexually obsessed to be a match for the Republican Party. Although I feel people like you, who are soooooo proud to be 35 and under, will change it for the worst. If that’s possible!

Living in New York, not visiting on business, is what has made me aware of the gay lifestyle. I suppose you always visit the shops on 6th St. and elsewhere that say: “If you do not support gay marriage, don’t enter my store?” I didn’t think so.

[miss marmelstein]

Oh, no! Chicken farms!

We are in a real drought here. Everything is brown, brown, brown.

[Tax-chick]

It’s been almost 2 weeks since the last rain here.