Sounds like a SCOTUS test case to legalize incest.
1 posted on
09/08/2016 8:57:04 AM PDT by
C19fan
To: C19fan
She was also married to her son as well.
To: C19fan
Yep. If marriage means you can marry whoever you “love”, then this mother/daughter marriage is A-OK. You can’t discriminate, you bigot. /do I need the sarcasm tag
3 posted on
09/08/2016 9:00:53 AM PDT by
Reddy
(B.O. stinks)
To: C19fan
I posted another story about this yesterday, interesting to read the article in the British press.
Oh, here is the happy couple:
(I would have shrunk the picture down a bit but then it loses some of the attractive piercings)
4 posted on
09/08/2016 9:05:50 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(There is always one more idiot than you counted on.)
To: C19fan
If anyone thinks this is not serious, then think again, it could lead to polygamy.
5 posted on
09/08/2016 9:12:28 AM PDT by
ravenwolf
(If the Bible does not say it in plain words, please don`t preach it to me.)
To: C19fan
Once you say Gay marriage is ok how can you prohibit gay incest?..prohibiting incest is because of reproduction...”inbreeding”..a not issues with gay..so you just slip down the slipper slop now
6 posted on
09/08/2016 9:20:26 AM PDT by
tophat9000
(King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
To: C19fan
The logical outcome of legalizing gay marriage
To: C19fan
Really? Misty Velvet Dawn? Worst stripper/porn name ever.
8 posted on
09/08/2016 9:55:46 AM PDT by
cport
(How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
To: C19fan
I bet the poor dog will be the next one the mom will want to marry.
10 posted on
09/08/2016 10:05:46 AM PDT by
Wisconsinlady
(What we tolerate today, our children will embrace tomorrow)
To: C19fan
Why do we now live in a world where there are so many people desperately trying to get noticed?
To: C19fan
14 posted on
09/08/2016 12:23:24 PM PDT by
fwdude
(If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
To: C19fan
Interesting, story says they are both in jail. That suggests that the “victim” in the case is someone other than the two of them.
So, who exactly is the victim here? Who did they harm by this absurd “marriage”?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson