Posted on 08/27/2016 1:44:28 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
The Presidential Debate moderators have not yet been chosen. Therefore my question is who should NOT be a debate moderator? Not just somebody who has some bias but someone who under NO CONDITION should be allowed to moderate any of the debates.
I'll lead off by naming two:
1. Shepard Smith---Not after what he said about Trump "trading in racism" this week.
2. John Harwood of CNBC---Not after he completely disgraced himself at the GOP debates last year.
ANNNNND most of FOX
Bill Clinton, George Soros, ANY Liberal Hollywood Actor, Tim Kaine, Don Lemon, Donna Brazile,
Andrew Tobias, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, Rachael Maddow, actually anyone for MSNBC, the Ghost of Elinor Roosevelt...
ANY anchor of ANY network who has publicly or in print stated their intense PERSONAL dislike of Trump AND their PERSONAL admiration of Clinton.
George Steponallofus
The moderators will be leftist partisans and will join with Mrs Bill to try to eviscerate Mr. Trump. He is the one guy for whom I think it does not matter who the moderators are and it may even go better for him if they are obvious Democrat partisans. The only tactic they have is to not let him speak and that ain’t gonna work.
I think that I would make a decent moderator.
I meant the ghost of Eleanor Roosevelt...obviously.
Megyn Kelly
Anybody associated with MSNBC!
Reverse psychology...Sean Hanity, Laura Ingraham, Clint Eastwood...
Everyone should not be a moderator.
There is no need for one.
Let them moderate themselves and see what happens.
It does not matter who moderates the debates. Hillary is your next President. This country is controlled by insiders and the last 3 Presidents were insiders and regardless of what they say or do in public they are tied at the hip and Trump in no way shape,fashion or form can he be allowed to be President. The only exception possibly is if the CIA,FBI and NSA find a way to convert or control him.
I have no doubt Bill Clinton was responsible for and could have stopped 9-11. I have no doubt George Bush covered up for him and for the above mentioned organizations and Barack Obama is also covering for them. Hillary Clinton could just as easily been charged over this email situation as any of the Obama Seven and therein lies Obama’s tie.
To supposedly having so different opinions,Clinton,Bush and Obama are all guilty of being members of a Fraternity that does not allow Americans to know what is going on and they are all guilty of disregarding the Constitution and defying the law. Congress is just as guilty.
The Hitler Regime could not hold the likes of what the last 3 Presidents of the USA are guilty of in my opinion.
Anyone from the media, or anyone who has been politically active. Personally, if I were moderating, I would have a very hard time being unbiased against Hillary, and I feel compelled in general to be fair in life. Why should anyone believe that those biased toward the left, especially those whose stature and relevance is predicated on perpetuation of the same political power structure that now exists, would be able to be fair to Trump? They can’t, and won’t be. That’s why they should be excluded.
Jesse Jackson, Elizabeth Warren, Bill Maher and Colin Kaepernick...
...hah, that could be the start of a joke, just sayin’.
Candice Crowley
Not Martha Raddatz who allowed Biden to keep interrupting Ryan and began the debate by talking about our soldiers pissing on dead bodies.
!!!!! EVERYBODY !!!!!
Political debates should have *no* moderator or questioners, especially from the media. Should be Lincoln-Douglas style, with 5-7 debates, 2-3 hours each on a specific topic, and 1-2 short breaks. Timekeeper only to keep it even, with candidates speaking to the audience & cameras, and also questioning each other. Candidates can be seated, but because of Hillary’s obvious health problems, would prefer they stand. Notes and table or podium to hold them OK.
Just how much tin foil are wearing on your head?
Such defeatism isn’t healthy.
The subset of those that SHOULD is much much smaller than those that should not.
The "should nots" comprise almost all of the universal set when it comes to those claiming to be "journalists".
Or Ingraham or Savage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.