Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/20/2016 12:22:18 PM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

Science is never settled. Not even global warming except in the minds of leftists wishing to control the means of production.


2 posted on 08/20/2016 12:23:50 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The CAGW “Scientists” are no where up to the caliber of Einstein.


3 posted on 08/20/2016 12:24:53 PM PDT by Paladin2 (auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“Imagination is more important than knowledge...”

~ Attributed to Albert Einstein ~

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-Yp6QPso-ev8/UNyU_rL8JdI/AAAAAAAAAF8/eEyGaF_Enjg/s1600/alberteinstein+quote++stupidity+vs+genius.jpg


4 posted on 08/20/2016 12:28:25 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

OK!! Everybody pay attention!

Lesson for today:

1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.

2. The sun is a giant nuclear furnace that controls the climates of all its planets.

3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.

4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.

5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.

Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?


6 posted on 08/20/2016 12:38:15 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

What? Scientists are capable of group think and will mock heretics? Perish the thought. /sarcasm.


7 posted on 08/20/2016 12:47:06 PM PDT by ronnietherocket3 (Mary is understood by the heart, not study of scripture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Rarely us a paper published concerning a new idea followed by wide acceptance


9 posted on 08/20/2016 12:52:42 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
This is M51, the Whirlpool galaxy.




The smaller galaxy is NGC 5195 .   Tidal distortion of
M51's larger arm looks to have been caused by NGC 5195.
Yet, in the early 1990s, NGC 5195 was found to have such
a markedly different red shift from M51, that the dwarf
galaxy was actually a great distance behind M51 and could
not possibly have any effect on it.

I went to a lecture given by a visiting astronomer that had to
do with star formation, galaxies, the Hertzsprung-Russell
diagram, etc.  Following the lecture I went up to the
astronomer and asked him about the discrepancy between
what our eyes told us and what the science told us. 
With red-faced anger, he told me they were not going to
throw out other scientific knowledge based on one
anomaly.

Nowadays, radio astronomy tells us there are knots of
matter connecting the M51 arm and NGC 5195, which
is not in the distant background, after all.  I don't know
when or how the problem of the red shift was solved.



10 posted on 08/20/2016 12:57:41 PM PDT by sparklite2 ( "The white man is the Jew of Liberal Fascism." -Jonah Goldberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Einstein was an outsider and, due to some of the work he’d done in school, a believer in particles, something forbidden in German physics at the time. All three of his famous papers of 1905 were due to a belief that particles were real rather than just wave phenomena.

Boltzmann was driven to suicide over a similar conflict with the physics establishment.


11 posted on 08/20/2016 12:57:41 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

As I recall Einstein stopped at “Special Relativity”. AFAIK, General Relativity has yet to happen.


13 posted on 08/20/2016 12:58:18 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

“Sometimes scientists have too much invested in the status quo to accept a new way of looking at things.”

I think that describes pretty well the current situation. Scientists have a lot invested in Einstein’s theories.


15 posted on 08/20/2016 1:07:47 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Einstein too, will one day fall.

Maybe then, people will get to work in earnest, figuring out faster-than-light travel.


17 posted on 08/20/2016 1:17:15 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Sometimes scientists have too much invested in the status quo to accept a new way of looking at things.

Sometimes?? Academics in general, and not just in the sciences, defend whatever dogma and theory they've published like psychotic badgers defending a den.

19 posted on 08/20/2016 1:27:04 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Sometimes scientists have too much invested in the status quo to accept a new way of looking at things.

Ditto for engineers. At the large tech company where I work, I've tried to push new ways of doing things and new technologies my whole career. It's extremely difficult.

There's a whole cadre of grand poobah type senior technical personnel that have always done things in a certain way that worked for them. They will NOT change or give new technologies a chance unless they've already been adopted by our competitors and we're obviously behind the technology curve.

Never underestimate the stubbornness and close mindedness of the senior technical community that sits in judgement of their peers and junior staff members. The majority are threatened by new ideas. I've been fighting it myself for many years now.

20 posted on 08/20/2016 1:29:41 PM PDT by MCH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

http://www.space.com/17661-theory-general-relativity.html


21 posted on 08/20/2016 2:07:35 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Excellent read - “The Structure of Scientific Revolution” by Thomas Kuhn

One of the top 5 books everyone should read on my personal list :-)

Explains a lot of post modern thought and shows how physics can be applied to social phenomenon. Focus on the concept of the “paradigm.”

Read it in small doses.


23 posted on 08/20/2016 2:30:08 PM PDT by KosmicKitty (Waiting for inspirations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

i always thought is was the I before E thing. He has it wrong twice in his name.


24 posted on 08/20/2016 2:44:26 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
Just a reminder for those wondering about "settled science."

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

34 posted on 08/20/2016 3:39:04 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Cuckservative: a "conservative" willing to raise another country's ideology in his own country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

In 1676 Danish Lutheran astronomer, Ole Roemer, presented his timing measurements of the eclipses of Jupiter’s moon Io, showing that the speed of light was finite. While a few scientists (e.g., Isaac Newton and Christiaan Huygens) supported Roemer, the general scientific community held that the speed of light was infinitely fast. Over half-a-century later (and almost two decades after Roemer’s death), English physicist James Bradley confirmed in 1728 the finite speed of light using stellar aberration measurements.


37 posted on 08/20/2016 3:57:19 PM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Sheldon’s grandfather argued that Einstein was wrong.


41 posted on 08/20/2016 4:31:14 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson