Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA’s new space plane is getting ready to take flight
Washington Post ^ | July 29 at 10:06 AM | Christian Davenport

Posted on 07/29/2016 8:31:59 PM PDT by BenLurkin

Edited on 07/29/2016 9:42:30 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

NASA

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 2016; aviation; dreamchaser; nasa; sierranevada; sierranevadacorp; snc; spaceplane; starliner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Jack Hammer

Actually, the manned version had room for seven crew. The unmanned version should have a bit more room, IIRC.


21 posted on 07/29/2016 10:47:49 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
NASA has reinvented the Dyna-Soar X-20 lifting body proposed by the USAF in the early 1960s. Cutting edge NASA “Muslim outreach” thinking?
22 posted on 07/29/2016 10:55:37 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

Aerodynamics drives the designs. You can either use a capsule and land using parachutes, or by a winged body. A lifting body is necessary, since larger wing cannot take the re-entry loads. If you have a better idea, the aerospace industry would love to hear it.

While the X-20 is the predecessor, there are a long line of improvements since then, culminating in NASA’s HL-20 lifting body, which the Dream Chaser is based on.

But the biggest differences is that this lifting body will be spaceworthy, unlike its predecessors. And it uses cutting-edge materials that did not exist until recently.

Finally, while NASA is paying for the ability to send cargo to the ISS, the development of the Dream Chaser is directed by SNC, not some middle manager at NASA.


23 posted on 07/29/2016 11:16:00 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

Good post. Look forward to seeing this thing eventually launch and make it to the ISS. Would like also to see someone pay for a crewed version, even if NASA is saying no thanks for now.


24 posted on 07/29/2016 11:28:51 PM PDT by Dagnabitt (Trump - Because countries without Islamic immigration are countries without Islamic terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

Thank you. I would love to see this manned as well.


25 posted on 07/29/2016 11:31:54 PM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
NASA has lost its way. NASA is nothing more that a slow, cumbersome bureaucracy that stumbles and lurches along in fits and starts. I believe that real exploration and exploitation of space should be done in the private sector. They have the flexibility and quickness that NASA lacks. Unfortunately, NASA has the lion's share of funding.
26 posted on 07/29/2016 11:48:14 PM PDT by MasterGunner01 ( To err is human, to forgive is not our policy. -- SEAL Team SIX:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Impressive. A space craft that can go all the way to 13,000 feet and return.

Need to check my calendar. Is this 1959?


27 posted on 07/30/2016 6:21:17 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

After the military screwed it up, it didn’t take long for them to lose interest. They abandoned the Shuttle long before NASA did.


28 posted on 07/30/2016 6:29:06 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

” NASA stuck with the original smaller design, the Space Shuttles would still be in use and we would have dozens of them in use. As with all government projects”

Maybe, but the ISS never gets built without the SS that was ultimately built due to its payload capabilities. Whether the ISS was worth is another discussion.


29 posted on 07/30/2016 6:29:57 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

NASA is going to have more manned flight capability than it’s ever had within the next couple of years.


30 posted on 07/30/2016 6:31:30 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Looks like it has just about enough room for six bags of groceries and maybe some DVDs.

...

It will be able to lift 5500kg to the ISS. The Spacex cargo capsule lifts 6000kg, so it’s comparable. Both systems bolt an extra disposable cargo hold on to the rear for extra room.


31 posted on 07/30/2016 6:42:14 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
It just has to hold our dreams.

Do Italians dream of Empire?

32 posted on 07/30/2016 8:24:38 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

They are just checking the glide and landing capability, just like the did with the Enterprise shuttle. In the near future, this Dream Chaser will go to the ISS.


33 posted on 07/30/2016 9:15:28 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62; MasterGunner01

Well, they will have one NASA-designed manned vehicle system, and several commercially-designed manned vehicles. But all, to some extent, are indeed funded by NASA.


34 posted on 07/30/2016 9:19:35 AM PDT by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson