Posted on 07/22/2016 6:16:49 AM PDT by orchestra
I give the speech an A and the “insiders” a D
I believe the election will boiled down to this question “Is Trump risky?”. When that is answered “ no” she will suffer the fate of Carter. It is the question libs asked of Reagan.
Well said!
I was pleasantly surprised to enjoy CSPAN's coverage. Didn't miss pundits "looking for a problem to have," one bit.
Yeah, in Austin they have a saying “keep Austin weird.” Nearby rivals Texas A&M (many of who’s students are from Austin) came up with a counter slogan, “Make Austin Normal,” and I adapted it for the national scale.
Shouldn't we be asking this in regards to Hillary Clinton? I think given the innumerable ISIS-inspired terrorist attacks, then the answer is an emphatic YES!!
He already leads indies by a gabillion. A convention speech is meant to bring home your primary opponents. Or in Tedlim's case, humble him and bring him to heel - in a historic way - by letting him autoflame himself...
That was 2012. Do we rehire Bobo, or is Bishop Dullard risky? That was answered by Mr. 47%'s hoof-in-mouth disease.
This is a wave election, and thus it pivots on Cankles: "Will the status quo do?" for a Bobo 3rd term. That answer is resoundingly NO. If Michael Moore knows it, EVERYBODY knows it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.