Posted on 07/05/2016 9:10:52 AM PDT by Don Hernando de Las Casas
Comeys words
Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton's position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later "up-classified" e-mails). None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government--or even with a commercial service like Gmail. Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked "classified" in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.
Interpretation: Shes guilty, but nobody would ever think of prosecuting her. Hey, Comey! This was NOT a slip up or mistake on hillarys partthis was sop, all day every day for SIX LONG YEARS, this was an ongoing, continuous breaking of the law day in and day out, and she cannot be prosecuted?
*BUMP* :)
Right, Comey says she committed crimes. He outlined how all her statements were lies. And then he says no reasonable prosecutors would prosecute. Which means, if you are too politically important, you are above the law.
Reasonable prosecutors are clearly prosecutors who protect their own ass. What does this say about our government? Its rigged.
He gave her cover.
Trump can run all summer on “Hillary was accused of being careless with classified documents” by the FBI. You want a careless person to be president?
(He gave her cover.)
He gave Trump ammo!
“...we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws...”
Good to know. It’s comforting to know if I break the law, all I have to do is say I didn’t intend to break the law, and I will be set free.
Remember Scooter Libby? He allegedly outed Vallarie Plame regarding her desk job at the CIA. Wasn’t Scooter at all and they failed to prove their contention yet they prosecuted Scooter because he allegedly lied to a FBI agent. Scooter did time. The only evidence that the FBI had on Scooter were the hand-written notes of an interview that Scooter did with an FBI agent. Yet he went to jail. Why? Because he was an aide to the vile Vice-President Dick Cheney. Washington is rotten to the core. God please help my Grandchildren.
WILL not...
He lays out the case fully and then says....oh well never mind
Corruption runs deep
Gross Negligence is also actionable under “Care Less Ness” because it presumes a lack of directed agency to safeguard against a peril...
DO NOT TRUST OUR MILITARY LEADERS!!!! LOOK WHAT THEY HAVE DONE!!
Did he? If he put out the same report of discoveries and then recommended prosecution, what would Lynch and Obama and Congressional Rats do? Recommend a Special Prosecutor, shred all of Comeys work as biased and unprofessional, fire Comey and the agents he worked with, and start all over again. What Hillary did involved the direct criminal actions of the President of the United States. That was her leverage on him, and Bill reminded Lynch of that on the plane, face to face.
As it is, Comey is preserving his work for another day. After all, Trump said he'd prosecute, and Comey said he has prosecutable evidence. So where's the problem here? If you look squarely at what is going on, it's LYNCH who announced she wouldn't prosecute, because Comey works FOR Lynch. And Lynch ordered Comey to not recommend prosecution - but she didn't order him not to find evidence of crimes. So, he found the evidence, and obeyed his boss's orders, which BTW came ultimately from the President himself.
It’s as obvious as the wart on Obama’s face. Anyone who has been around classified messages and networks would know this.
Why would you believe the FBI anyway. How many senior bankers went to jail over the huge loan scandals that virtually sunk the country in 2008.....NOT A ONE. I guess they did not willfully do what is was they did, by Comey’s standards that is.
“Isn’t there like a statue of limitations on that?”
“Statute.”
“What?”
“Statute of limitations. It’s not a statue.”
“No, it’s statue.”
“Fine, it’s a sculpture of limitations.”
- Kramer and Jerry, in “The Cafe”
Et tu, Comey?
“If Trump wins in November Hillary will be pardoned in December (or January)”
If Trump wins in November, he better absolutely clean house on ALL CAREER PEOPLE IN THE WASHINGTON D.C. GOVERNMENT.
The problem here. Is that He ends by making a case that no prosecutor would go after someone so big. He practically said, she is above the law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.