Posted on 06/05/2016 8:28:00 PM PDT by MtnClimber
Ive decided to come off the sidelines and endorse a candidate for President of the United States.
Ill start by reminding readers that my politics dont align with any of the candidates. My interest in the race has been limited to Trumps extraordinary persuasion skills. But lately Hillary Clinton has moved into the persuasion game and away from boring facts and policies with great success. Lets talk about that.
This past week we saw Clinton pair the idea of President Trump with nuclear disaster, racism, Hitler, the Holocaust, and whatever else makes you tremble in fear.
That is good persuasion if you can pull it off because fear is a strong motivator. It is also a sharp pivot from Clintons prior approach of talking about her mastery of policy details, her experience, and her gender. Trump took her so-called woman card and turned it into a liability. So Clinton wisely pivoted. Her new scare tactics are solid-gold persuasion. I wouldnt be surprised if you see Clintons numbers versus Trump improve in June, at least temporarily, until Trump finds a counter-move.
The only downside I can see to the new approach is that it is likely to trigger a race war in the United States. And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (Im called an apologist on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels).
If Clinton successfully pairs Trump with Hitler in your mind as she is doing and loses anyway, about a quarter of the country will think it is morally justified to assassinate their own leader. I too would feel that way if an actual Hitler came to power in this country. I would join the resistance and try to take out the Hitler-like leader. You should do the same. No one wants an actual President Hitler.
Truly these images authenticated or not have nothing to do with supporting Trump. Instead all who support Donald Trump should be mindful of how this same propaganda will be used against his candidacy. The opposition will use same and more to defeat Trump. ...and no I am not a Moron... Sad that FR community cannot have a discussion without ad hominem attacks re: intelligence, sobriety or any other perceived failure. More to come I am sure... Divide and conquer... Dems get it.
Sorry for you FRiend.
The image is well-authenticated. It depicts a Jewish woman being stoned by Ukrainian Nazi utes in the Lvov progrom of 1941.
Let’s see how many in the Mainstream Media take the bait.
<>p>He’s banking on widespread publicity of this satire in order to have its effect.
Love it! He has helped Trump define Hillary and hers a little bit more succinctly...
So Ive decided to endorse Hillary Clinton convert to Islam for President, for my personal safety. Trump supporters Christians dont have any bad feelings about patriotic Americans Muslims such as myself, so Ill be safe from that crowd. But Clinton supporters Muslims have convinced me and here I am being 100% serious that my safety is at risk if I am seen as Christian supportive of Trump. So Im taking the safe way out and converting to Islam endorsing Hillary Clinton for president.
Well this is Scott Adams speaking, but I heard the words coming from both Dilbert and Wally.
Total Satire
Let us see. If the libtards are dumb enough to try insurrection when they are totally out of power the result could be very favorable.
Excellent... Adams can now continue to predict and analyze Trump without appearing to be some sort of shill. He has previously said he doesn’t support either party... so this is naturally a bit of satire, but it makes an insidious point regarding Hillary.
>>>And I would be a top-ten assassination target in that scenario because once you define Trump as Hitler, you also give citizens moral permission to kill him. And obviously it would be okay to kill anyone who actively supports a genocidal dictator, including anyone who wrote about his persuasion skills in positive terms. (Im called an apologist on Twitter, or sometimes just Joseph Goebbels). <<<<
sounds like Scott has already had death threats. This was his best so far IMO, satire laced with some scary stuff.....
I agree. Kind of like a double negative, this is double satire.
“No one wants an actual President Hitler.”
Or a Stalin. Are you listening, Bernie?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.