Posted on 05/14/2016 8:45:15 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder
Interviews reveal unwelcome advances, a shrewd reliance on ambition, and unsettling workplace conduct over decades.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Clutching at straws.
Best election ever!
Hey, NYT—It’s only sex.
How would you say “Wile E Coyote” in Spanish?
I like how it starts off with a 26 year old model who was shocked that Trump provided her a bikini where all the women at the party were in the pool. And he commented that she looked hot or something.
She seems to not notice that she was at a millionaire pool party with no skill or asset beyond looking attractive. She seems to have no concept that on that same day in the 1980s that less attractive women were somewhere, working the evening shift at some thankless job while she was lounging around the pool being eye candy, and being told she was very attractive.
Screw her. Typical mentality, “I am here solely because of my looks, but don’t you DARE look at me that way”.
And the author’s first name is Megan....go figure!
Hummm, ...the proved liars at the New York Slimes, owned by Mexican criminal Carlos Slim, and
Only 6% of Americans trust the media
Not taking any risk here, this is False Witness, horse manure from degenerate shills.
What xenophobia?
And of course she was FORCED into wearing that swimsuit. It was swimsuit rape. It was bikiniaggression.
Because the NY Times views women as inferior people who cannot think for themselves.
Just read it. Is there any ‘there’ there?
What is the accusation?
As far as I could tell, it is mostly “he pushed women about appearance, and he admired appearance, and he might have slept with a few.”
And?
That can also be said about a gazillion not so rich guys.
All of this pales in comparison to Bill Clinton and the enabler Hillary Clinton. I bet Trump is licking his chops over this one.
No problem for the Times to bring this up. Just an opportunity to talk about the BJ Clinton flying around the world on the Pedo Express.
Amazing. The plight of women at east coast high finance parties. This is going to be THE issue for the election. lol/s
Do they have any idea what life is like for women who aren’t models? This is the funniest story of the day.
Trump is correct when he said Hillary enabled Bill's horn-dog philandering. She is not fighting FOR women but against them.
Screw her. Typical mentality, I am here solely because of my looks, but dont you DARE look at me that way.
One fact I’ve gathered in my old age is that women never mind “sexism” when it’s in their favor.
I'll be waiting with glee for the NYSLIMES hit piece on Hillary and her treatment of women, men, Secret Service Agents and the people around her in State Department about what a horrible witch she was. Just saying....
If it's a Republican, this is considered an "unwanted advance" but if a Democrat like Bill Clinton actually feels up a woman, not his wife, this is considered okay as long as he keeps abortion legal. This is "liberal logic".
Its something he had wanted since his father bought him toy cars... I was able to obtain it for him. He was beyond thrilled. And I became the woman in his life who could do no wrong. And he became the man in my life who was going to be my mentor.Louise Sunshine, former Trump executive
This is the kind of favor both men and women seek the opportunity to do in the business world to get ahead. It demonstrates that a person either has connections or is able to forge connections so that he or she can get difficult jobs done under pressure down the line: he is unafraid to approach people for favors and willing to help others network and create influence. People kill for opportunities to put something together like this. Every episode of The Apprentice for ten years showed how effective this kind of backscratching is for fundraising or getting things done. And the New York Times knows this very well. Yet they morally preen.
And she doesn't expect her body to be viewed or even assessed by the owner of the modeling agency? She has already commodified it.
What complete tripe this article is.
“Lose the xenophobia.”
Say what?
“Lose the xenophobia. It detracts from the story.”
Lose the Mexican loving knee jerk reaction. It is an important data point that it’s Mexican owned paper that is doing an anti-Trump hit piece.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.