Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boycott the Pro Cruz article spammers
Vanity | May 1, 2016 | Kudsman

Posted on 05/01/2016 5:00:49 AM PDT by Kudsman

Sorry for the vanity, but this is getting tiresome to me. The same few posters find any drivel to support Lyin' Ted or any screed to jab Mr. Trump. We all know who they are. What if nobody responds to their attempts to incite? Maybe the threads die out sooner and some of the invectives against one another lessen.

I know that I have been purposely avoiding even reading articles posted by the select few. I have found my blood pressure to be much better once I started ignoring the falling trees.


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: cruz; gopbr; lyinted; wedontkissrings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-222 next last
To: VanDeKoik
And all of the other names Cruz people have been using for months that you pretend like you never heard of?

I heard them all...

"Trumpanziees" is over the top...I haven't seen that one for a while

The rest are aren't nice, but expected...

Not one of those terms you listed describe adherence to Donald Trump in terms akin to the Islamic evil of cutting off heads, raping women and children, stated goals of destroying everything not Islamic, burning people alive, etc, etc..the list is almost endless...

How in the world can you justify it's use?

Oh' wait..."The end justifies the means" does work !

61 posted on 05/01/2016 6:30:10 AM PDT by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

This whole thread represents the demise of Free Republic as I’ve known it all these years. I honestly prefer others to Trump in large part because I am intimately familiar with the type and sceptical about his true motives. I don’t believe you can invest your trust in any one man the way many Trump supporters have done. Trump supporter behavior both on Free Republic and in my community have increased rather than lessened my doubts about the man. The dragging in of questionable sources, outright lies and ignoring legitimate information has made this forum unreadable. I can go through and read the articles and avoid the comments but I can also go to the sources on my own. Without the fellowship of and interaction in the comments section the forum has a greatly reduced value. I logged on today for the first time in a week or so to see if it was any better. The first post I see is one that advocates elimination of all but a single point of view. What more can I say.


62 posted on 05/01/2016 6:31:25 AM PDT by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

Calls to boycott this or prohibit that are pathetic, in my opinion, and give a bad impression of one’s candidate.


63 posted on 05/01/2016 6:32:24 AM PDT by Tax-chick (What do you think it means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

I’ve noticed 2nddivisionvet has quit his posting since last tuesday.


64 posted on 05/01/2016 6:33:03 AM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roses0508

You could come by the Undead Thread and talk about the weather and share cat pictures ...


65 posted on 05/01/2016 6:33:48 AM PDT by Tax-chick (What do you think it means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

You should maybe go back - oh, way back - and look at how supportive this forum was for Ted Cruz up to the point where Trump started pushing your emotional buttons. Feel free to delete Cruz supporters, I expect this kind of behavior from Trump cultists, but please don’t ever again use the false argument that Trump is some kind of Big Tent genius.


66 posted on 05/01/2016 6:38:46 AM PDT by MaggiesPitchfork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seruzawa

It’s not “shutting down cruz supporters”. It’s trying to maintain an effective website. Some of the cruzers have basically become nothing but trolls and spammers.

That’s how I see it. There’s no reason to have a dialogue with nasty, delusional jerks. If we want that, we should let the Democrats on the board, too.


67 posted on 05/01/2016 6:40:14 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik; Popman
Ok. So naturally, because this election is so important, it evokes strong emotional responses from both sides. With things winding down, how do we get past the name calling? All hands are going to be required on deck if we are to stop the Clinton/ Media machine.

As some here have wrongly inferred, I am not for "shutting anyone up". All I'm saying is that until this primary is settled it may help if the Trump camp backs off the bait some article posters want to put out there. Let the Mr. Cruz supporters back slap each other on their threads. If an obvious error is observed by them and someone needs to correct it, try to do so without the taunts.

68 posted on 05/01/2016 6:40:37 AM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman; Jim Robinson

YOU ARE SUPPRESSING THE 1st AMENDMENT! And I don’t care which man you support. FR has become known as TRUMP CENTRAL, JUST LIKE BREITBART, FNC AND DRUDGE. NO FAIRNESS ALLOWED.

You are driving long time FR supporters away. That means you are going to have to dig deeper to support the site.


69 posted on 05/01/2016 6:40:41 AM PDT by GailA (any politician that won't keep his word to Veterans/Military won't keep them to You!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

“How in the world can you justify it’s use? “

Because lots of Trump people at first did not use any of those names.

But among the Cruz people, it became so fashionable and acceptable to casually and constantly use them, that many Trump people got fed up in the end and started making up their own.

In the beginning I had always said “Cruz people” and “Cruz supporters”, but even in the end I got sick of their constant use of those stupid names, and slipped into making up my own.

I for one will be glad when all of it disappears into FR history and we all laugh about it years from now.


70 posted on 05/01/2016 6:41:00 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Roses0508; Tax-chick

Good grief it is silly to say Cruz supporters are banned/boycotted. Because you have a favorable opinion of Cruz does not mean that I personally MUST read your thread anymore than you need to upset yourself reading pro Trump threads. They are here for whoever chooses and should be banned only if offensive.

My boycotting your Cruz thread means nothing more than I dislike the man and avoid upsetting myself with it. You are free to post whatever non offensive materials Jim allows and it seems to me he only draws a line at those who would prefer Hillary. Honesty is your friend!


71 posted on 05/01/2016 6:42:03 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

He’s still commenting as of yesterday. Might just be taking a lower profile until Cruz sees the light and drops out. The writing is on the wall.
He is one of the FReepers I don’t want to see leave.
Some of the others on the zot list I won’t miss at all.


72 posted on 05/01/2016 6:42:21 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nclaurel

You have no idea what threads I read (although my posting history is public), nor do I know that about you. Your “boycotting” a positive thread about Cruz is an invisible, private act, which nobody would ever notice unless you made a public scene about it ... which is what the OP seems to be advocating.


73 posted on 05/01/2016 6:45:39 AM PDT by Tax-chick (What do you think it means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: GailA

“YOU ARE SUPPRESSING THE 1st AMENDMENT! And I don’t care which man you support. FR has become known as TRUMP CENTRAL, JUST LIKE BREITBART, FNC AND DRUDGE. NO FAIRNESS ALLOWED.”

Nonsense. This is a discussion board. You do not have any first amendment rights to be heard here. It’s run by a team of moderators following the rules for content and decorum laid out by the people who started the site. We don’t let democrats rail on here, either... is THAT “suppressing” their first amendment rights, too?

And, yes, Trump is the presumptive candidate. There’s no reason to allow people here who have the intent to spew anti-Trump propaganda, insult him or his supporters, or really do anything BUT support him. Why would I let anyone into my home if their intent is to walk around and break things? I don’t see this cyber-space as being much different.


74 posted on 05/01/2016 6:46:31 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GailA

“YOU ARE SUPPRESSING THE 1st AMENDMENT! And I don’t care which man you support. FR has become known as TRUMP CENTRAL, JUST LIKE BREITBART, FNC AND DRUDGE. NO FAIRNESS ALLOWED.”

At least this person isnt demanding that JimRob kick off all Cruz supporters, like Cruz people tried twice back in January, nor are any Trump supporters making threats against the site owner, like Cruz supporters have done multiple times as well, including chewing him out in comments, and coaxing people to not donate to FR and instead give the money to Cruz.

And then you have the serial Cruz posters that would spam FR with the same story 5-10 times to the point where they HAD to be kicked off because they were trying to smother the site to a standstill.


75 posted on 05/01/2016 6:46:51 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

FR has become a Trump love fest forum. After 16 years with FR...goodbye all. I will find somewhere that has intelligent discourse.


76 posted on 05/01/2016 6:46:55 AM PDT by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

You seem to have selective memory...

The nasty name calling and lying on the Trump side started when your candidate started using it in his campaign rhetoric...

That doesn’t justify what Cruz supporters called Trump supporters..

I’d be very glad when this is over...


77 posted on 05/01/2016 6:48:17 AM PDT by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Roses0508

You putting your own bias into my premise. Nowhere have I asked to eliminate anyone’s point of view. What am I suggesting is that those that disagree with it may any to consider avoiding it altogether. We have watched so many threads devolve into flames. The only purpose it serves is the left’s desire to pit us against one another.


78 posted on 05/01/2016 6:49:12 AM PDT by Kudsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Pravious

Ah, sorry, GailA, if that wasn’t your quote I was responding to.


79 posted on 05/01/2016 6:49:15 AM PDT by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GailA

Fox News Channel has been anti-Trump from the get-go.


80 posted on 05/01/2016 6:49:19 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 221-222 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson