Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

If you luv tanks from the 1950s you will luv the Tiam. That is an ugly looking tank.
1 posted on 04/18/2016 6:23:18 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Show the pic: It comes with it’s own suicide vest.


2 posted on 04/18/2016 6:29:11 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Only with this f....t president would countries like this show off bull @#$@#$ hardware.


3 posted on 04/18/2016 6:30:34 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Post WWII American tanks, with the long turret bustle and large tracks, to this kid, were the epitome of what a tank should look like. But yeah, the reactive armor and scalloped side plates make this one look like dork city.


4 posted on 04/18/2016 6:37:49 AM PDT by Rinnwald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

5 posted on 04/18/2016 6:53:48 AM PDT by null and void ("when authority began inspiring contempt, it had stopped being authority" ~ H. Beam Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Tank does not look as advanced as German WWII tanks.


7 posted on 04/18/2016 6:59:51 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Ted Cruz was the man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The 105mm gun would be fairly ineffective against US, NATO, or Russian tanks...the Iranians obviously know this, so they must not have a ground war with the west in mind.

The side skirts look very thin - offering almost zero protection. As a side note, legend has it that the inventor of Chobham armor (the staple of US tanks) initially tried to market it to Iran, with no success.

The mobile AA gun looks more effective. They can shoot and scoot in a hurry...probably even hide them underground near their nuke sites.

Iran will probably start buying nicer toys, now that Barry released a gazillion dollars of assets.


9 posted on 04/18/2016 7:09:18 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I looked up this tank and found a youtube video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Sjkc6RQdTc

If it has gun stabilization, they didn’t demonstrate it. And, I don’t see a muzzle reference sensor either.

At the 1:12 mark, the camera flashes to a tank draped in some sort of camouflage. I think this might be the larger Karrar tank (Iran’s version of the T-90). Not sure why they are monkeying around with the Tiam, if they’ve already started the Karrar production.


17 posted on 04/18/2016 7:42:52 AM PDT by lacrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Cool. Our Abrams need better targets than old Soviet T86's.

I suspect these new Iranian miracle machines will have a life expectancy of about 10 minutes in the desert, what with the lack of maintenance and their tactical vulnerability.

19 posted on 04/18/2016 8:29:02 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Now all the Persians need is air superiority.

Otherwise, call the scrap yard.

5.56mm


22 posted on 04/18/2016 8:57:53 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

You got chocolate in my peanut butter! It’s good enough for suppression of dissenters, though why it needs reactive armor for that, I don’t know. At most they plan to use it for mop up against neighboring T-60’s and the like.


29 posted on 04/18/2016 2:07:05 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson