Posted on 04/12/2016 1:02:39 PM PDT by Morgana
Planned Parenthood abortionists Mary Gatter and Deborah Nucatola were outed by the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) whose undercover videos exposed Planned Parenthoods gruesome baby parts operation. Ironically, they authored a research paper on Digoxin for inducing fetal death prior to second-trimester surgical abortion.
Gatter was recorded telling Center for Medical Progress investigators that she wanted a Lamborghini. A look at Planned Parenthoods compensation for Mary Gatter reveals that they paid her over ONE MILLION DOLLARS in less than 10 years for her work.
In the CMP video, the Planned Parenthood Federation of Americas Medical Directors Council President, Dr. Mary Gatter told actors she thought were buyers from a Biotech company that she had check to with their abortionist, Ian about performing a Less Crunchy technique to obtain more whole specimens.
By the lunchs end, Gatter suggests that their offer of $100 per specimen was not enough and then stated, Let me just figure out what others are getting, and if this is in the ballpark, then its fine, if its still low, then we can bump it up. I want a Lamborghini.
A new Lamborghini can cost upwards $200,000 and as it turns out Gatter can afford one.
Mary Gatter is listed as the 2013-2014 Medical Director of Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley.
BUT HER COMPENSATION CAME FROM PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
2004 $95,462 plus $13,058 in compensation
*****IMAGE ON LINK******
2007 $101,866 plus $7,376 in compensation
2008 $111,842
2009 $233,478 plus $9557 in compensation
2011 $244,455 plus $4476 retirement compensation plus $11,920 non taxable benefits
2012 $140,605 plus $2992 in compensation
2013 $100,427 plus $1712 in compensation
Deborah Nucatola was also exposed by the Center for Medical Progress and she received compensation from PP in Los Angeles as well. She described to CMP investigators how she would crush above and crush below the desired body part of the preborn child she aborted.
After completing my BS in Kinesiology at UW-Madison, I decided to go to medical school and planned to pursue orthopedic surgery. It was clear to me in medical school that I was attracted to the very hands-on, surgical specialties. But, by the end of my third year I was leaning in an entirely different direction. I completed medical school and did a residency in Obstetrics and Gynecology followed by a Fellowship in Family Planning Clinical Care and Research at the University of Southern California and I am happy to share that I have been Senior Director of Medical Services at Planned Parenthood Federation of America since 2009. I also continue to see patients.
2006 $116,615
2007 $203,180
****VIDEO AND COMPENSATION RECEIPTS ON LINK****
The Gruesome Twosome.
$1 mil of OUR money to these murderers. Infuriating.
Sounds more like the Sisterhood of Baby Butchers for Lamborghinis. Baby killers like to go fast I guess.
It really doesn’t matter what she is paid for her employment - what really matters is that such a position exists, and would have been filled by the next applicant who interviewed well...
DEFUND BABY KILLERS!
Taxpayers are being forced to pay to keep Planned Parenthood open. No choice.
estimated: 700 facilities
tax payer funding: $540,000,000
$540,000,000 / 700 = $771,000 per facility.
My guess is that’s enough to pay for most all their salaries.
Stupid article when they have to pad the time frame out to 10 years to get to $1 million in compensation so you can shock readers with SHE GETS $ Millllllion dollar.
Link in some bonus pay for baby parts harvested, reaped and sold and you’ll get my interest.
They make way less than I thought.
Bottom line is she can afford the car.
She won’t be able to drive that snazzy car in Hell.
Probably not. Taxes, mortgages, children perhaps?
Why didn’t they just present it as she averaged $122k per year over 10 years?
“Probably not. Taxes, mortgages, children perhaps?”
Does this woman strike you as the kind of person who has children?
Maybe. In the freezer.
OMG. I just ate. Sickening.
I’m not going to make any assumptions. The point was, the title and the article are intellectually dishonest.
Intellectually dishonest for a good cause is still intellectually dishonest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.