Posted on 04/12/2016 6:44:47 AM PDT by KeyLargo
Dems giddy over reported Laura Bush endorsement for Hillary Clinton April 11, 2016 | Carmine Sabia | Print Article
Democrats giddy about Laura Bush‘s recent comments on the presidential election are getting a dose of reality.
Last week, the former first lady was speaking at the Women In The World summit in New York when she made a statement that caused some to jump to the conclusion that Mrs. Bush is “ready for her.”
“I want our next president — whoever he or she might be — to be somebody who is interested in women in Afghanistan and who will continue U.S. policies … that we continue to do what we’re committed to do as a country,” Bush said.
“That’s who I want — or the kind of people that will do that and will pay attention to our history, and know what’s happened before and know specifically how we can continue to do the good things that we do around the world,” she continued.
Did that mean Mrs. Bush was supporting Hillary Clinton for president?
(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...
WOW. (Women of the World. Tattoo on Hillary’s left and right buttock.
Hillary is definitely interested in women.
As Wallace infamously asked the Honorable Michelle Bachman: “Are you a flake?”
Laura is definitely proving to be a flake which is too bad. In the White Hut she kept tight rein on her mouth.
Laura’s been very disappointing since she left the White House.
Pro-sodomite “marriage”, pro-abortion, and now this.
Dubya’s house is a shambles.
Mesh networking may serve to deter a complete takeover (central command and control) of the server system. Removing DNS for 2 days was fun last week... right?
One way of looking at mesh is as messaging by a bucket brigade, at least close to the two end nodes wanting to communicate. With more buckets and branches, exponential propagation could carry messaging to all devices participating. The shortcoming is the range and speed of single devices one-to-another. The guys working the Pirate Bay type angle know about decentralized serving of content, and could likely scrounge a secondary network.
Addendum: Multiple networks is a possibility which has not been sufficiently addressed in finding a community solution for redundant communications. The devices in our hands can be coaxed into communicating one with another, without an internet connection or cell tower signal.
The range is more limited without cell or internet connections, unless operating in a densely populated area, with enough devices to provide continuous geographic coverage. The benefit is more difficulty shutting down a network without the dependence of a central point to coordinate traffic flow.
Dubya's house or Dubya's whole party?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.