Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz supporters at this point are voting for the GOP Establishment to Choose the nominee.
self / opinion ^ | 4/1/2016 | Jack Black

Posted on 04/01/2016 8:41:50 AM PDT by Jack Black

There are only two choices remaining for how the GOP Nomination process goes.

There is no possibility of either Cruz or Kasich winning the nomination by delegate votes on the first ballot, so both of them are working to prevent Trump from reaching that threshold, and then hoping they are the choice of the open convention that results.

It's hard to handicap who walks out of Cleveland with the crown if we go in with Trump short of 1237 delegates.

What we do know is that the party is being extra-crafty to put party loyalists into as many of those delegate slots as possible. Some of those faux-Trump delegates may well support Cruz, but it's more likely that many are Romney era or even older GOP establishment types.

Do you know your county GOP chair? Those are the type of people who will be deciding the nominee in an open convention.

I think Cruz's chances of winning the nomination on a second or subsequent ballot are pretty poor. He's not loved by the GOP establishment, in fact some say he's liked less than Trump. Having pulled off a great political coup, with the open convention, you can be sure that the powers that be will not settle for Cruz.

This will be the golden opportunity to seat someone they really like.

My guess is Paul Ryan is that guy.

My serious question to Cruz supporters (and Kasich too if there are any here) is: do you prefer having the GOP Establishment pick the nominee to Trump?

And, secondly, if you will stipulate for the sake of discussion that Cruz is unlikely to be the guy, who do you want the GOP Establishment to choose?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; 2016; globalistcruz; nomination; noteligiblecruz; openboarderscruz; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last
To: FreeReign
So 43% of the delegates ARE required to vote for their candidate after the first round. I have not heard that. Source?

I really don't recall. Rush possibly or Mark Levin. You are smart to question it. It sounds right but I can't guarantee it. In any case the GOPe is going to have to get a large chunk of delegates to change their mind if they are going to push anybody but Cruz or Trump down our throats.

81 posted on 04/01/2016 9:52:49 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

It was the name of my dog that passed away and I don’t know how to change it. And it really doesn’t matter to me at this point what my screen name is. LOL


82 posted on 04/01/2016 9:53:26 AM PDT by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: jobim

“They cannot get past Trump’s lack of ideology, his past, his personality.”

This is actually a very accurate summary of what ails the GOP primary this year. Cruz is an imperfect candidate and Trump is an unknown candidate.

Kasich is just the northern version of JEB! He is not part of my calculus.

I am one who just can’t get past the very things you cite. Trump, it seems to me, is like the Affordable Care Act as Nancy Pelosi assured us: “We’ll have to pass it to see what is in it.” We would have to elect him to see what he is. I am not comfortable with that, and not optimistic..

That said, would I vote for Trump to stop Hillary? Yes, of course, to do otherwise is just stupid. What we would get with Hillary is not in doubt ... Obama’s third term. But I would vote for Trump in the general with many, many doubts. I don’t like him. I don’t trust him. I think he will be an easy target for Hillary’s goons. He is an even less able debater than she. I do not see him winning the general.

So, Trumpsters, get angry with me, if you must. But your anger won’t do much good. People with whom you do not already agree will not be persuaded by anger. They will only be persuaded by well-reasoned rational argument. And the only one who can do that is Trump himself. Trump must define his ideology. He must explain his past. And he must show himself to be of the right demeanor to be president. Failing that, I see no good outcome with Trump as the nominee.


83 posted on 04/01/2016 9:53:28 AM PDT by Belteshazzar (We are not justified by our works but by faith - De Jacob et vita beata 2 +Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

I am not aware of any state rules that permit first-ballot abstaining by committed delegates. Do you have a source?

The first ballot will be a roll call of states, with a state delegation spokesman announcing the vote as determined by state rules.


84 posted on 04/01/2016 9:54:47 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Cruz is delusional to think he won’t be cast aside at the convention.

He may have also been threatened.

1. Ted’s health insurance is via his wife’s job at Goldman Sachs. She’s the money maker in the family.

2. He needs donations. The establishment could primary Ted and knock him out of a job.

3. They might have details on the cheating scandal to hold over him.


85 posted on 04/01/2016 9:55:22 AM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beautiful_Gracious_Skies; All

The DNC can challenge him fifty times based on his lack of meeting the qualifications.

Cruz doesn’t even qualify to be on the ballot at the republican convention. He hasn’t won 8 states, right?


86 posted on 04/01/2016 9:55:53 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Cruz voters: Wake up! Trump is our only chance of stopping the gopE. If not now, never!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Durbin
It was the name of my dog that passed away and I don’t know how to change it. And it really doesn’t matter to me at this point what my screen name is. LOL

Thank you for explaining.. I will try and remember when I see the name.

87 posted on 04/01/2016 9:56:25 AM PDT by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill
Boy, what a mess. Frankly, I hadn't been paying too much attention to Kasich. I suppose I really should read up on him and his positions a bit.
88 posted on 04/01/2016 9:56:26 AM PDT by JustSurrounded (Disenfranchised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Cruz and Kasich are both tools, they know it, but they both don’t mind being used to manipulate the race for the establishment. Of the two, Kasich is the most likely real choice of the establishment, but Cruz, for all his talk of being an “outsider” is really an insider. They’ll pick Cruz over Trump, because they know that he’ll play ball with them, whereas they suspect that Trump would be less easily controlled.


89 posted on 04/01/2016 9:58:39 AM PDT by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

the only solution if they take it from Trump is to completely crush the GOPe in November..and I’m prepared to help even by voting D. The stink in the GOP is so bad the only solution is to give the democrats everything and hopefully collapse the country. I will pray for Americas complete and utter collapse..I just hope it’s quick. maybe that will wake people up.

Cruz will not have earned the nomination..period. he is a neocon and agrees with the GOP he’s just an whole about it


90 posted on 04/01/2016 9:59:42 AM PDT by ground_fog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

So how about this scenario - Rubio has not released his delegates, so still controls them for the first ballot. Suppose Trump and Rubio were to strike a deal, with Trump offering Rubio VP for his support on the first ballot.

If Trump has 1066 delegates or more, but falls short of the 1237, Trump plus Rubio delegates puts Trump over the top. Their combined delegate strength would also put them in control of any rules changes at the convention, blocking establishment attempts to name their own choice.


91 posted on 04/01/2016 10:01:11 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint
In any case the GOPe is going to have to get a large chunk of delegates to change their mind if they are going to push anybody but Cruz or Trump down our throats.

At this point, I'm thinking that too.

I will need to get more info though.

92 posted on 04/01/2016 10:02:29 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Velvet_Jones
At which time, they’ll chuck Cruz aside like a cheap Trollope, and install their preferred candidate.

According to the National Enquirer, Cruz has a lot of experience with 'cheap Trollopes' :)

93 posted on 04/01/2016 10:07:40 AM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a Tea Party descendant...steeped in the Constitutional Republic given to us by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

I think it was the website for a contested convention the GOP just put up.
Something here or there that I read just in the last few hours.


94 posted on 04/01/2016 10:09:59 AM PDT by MarMema (2016 - Trump or Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

It differs state to state what the delegates can do. I think there was a good thread here this morning with the details. Or it is on the GOP contested convention website..


95 posted on 04/01/2016 10:11:41 AM PDT by MarMema (2016 - Trump or Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David

I hope he just goes back to his life. He will be 70 this summer. He deserves to leave this crap behind and has the money to enjoy the last years.


96 posted on 04/01/2016 10:14:06 AM PDT by MarMema (2016 - Trump or Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Number 3. Yep.


97 posted on 04/01/2016 10:17:06 AM PDT by MarMema (2016 - Trump or Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey
It really doesn't make any difference how, or if, Cruz gets the nomination.

What's important is that I don't hold my nose when voting. Not any more.

98 posted on 04/01/2016 10:19:44 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

I’m pretty sure the majority needed for the nomination is a majority of actual votes, not the majority of pledged delegates. If 20 delegates abstain or otherwise do not vote, that would reduce the number needed by 10. That’s why there are alternate delegates. They get to vote if the actual delegate doesn’t for some reason.


99 posted on 04/01/2016 10:21:06 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Nope, we’re voting for Cruz to be the nominee, but go ahead and console yourself with this bit of crazy theory.

It's not a crazy thoery, it's simple math. You might think you are voting for Cruz to be the nominee, but you are really, at best, voting to have an open convention, and hoping that Cruz wins that convention.

Here is the link to the FiveThirtyEight site which is run by Nate Silver, the best elections statistician in the business.

Early on he built models for how well each candidate had to do to win the nomination. The models played to the candidates stregths, for instance Trump would have to win New York, New Jersey and do well in the mid-west states. Rubio needed to win Florida and it's big cache of delegates.

Here's a link to the performance against models graph

. What you see is that Cruz has only won 52% of what he should have to gain the nomination. Trump has won 95%, which means he's also not on track to win outright, so at this point the odds on favorite scenarios is (amazingly) the open convention.

The problem for Cruz is that there aren't enough contests left to win all the delegates he needs.

Cruz has 463 delegates of the needed 1237. He needs 774.

Here are all the contests remaining:

APRIL 1 North Dakota 28
APRIL 5 Wisconsin 42
APRIL 9 Colorado 37
APRIL 16 Wyoming 29
APRIL 19 New York 95
APRIL 26 Connecticut 28
Delaware 16
Maryland 38
Pennsylvania 71
Rhode Island 19
MAY 3 Indiana 57
MAY 10 Nebraska 36
West Virginia 34
MAY 17 Oregon 28
MAY 24 Washington 44
JUNE 7 California 172
Montana 27
New Jersey 51
New Mexico 24
South Dakota 29
TOTAL 905

The only way Ted could do this would be to win almost every state, and win many of them by 100% because they are not winner take all.

That's not gong to happen.

After New York, if not sooner, Ted will join Kasich in needing more delegates to win the nomination than are available in the remaining contests and, as the pundits say, it will become a mathematical impossibility for him to win the nomination on the first ballot.

(BTW: most elections are called when the votes needed for the guy behind to catch back up become so large that it is insurmountable. That's happened to Ted.)

Ted's a smart guy. He went to Yale, I'm sure he's done the math. Ted is playing to deny Trump and force the open convention.

You are being played by Ted if you don't understand that and think he's still trying to win the nomination conventionally, with the majority of delegates.

Cheers!

100 posted on 04/01/2016 10:22:13 AM PDT by Jack Black ( "Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocide")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson