Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

King Richard III's grave
Sketchfab ^ | 03.16.2016

Posted on 03/22/2016 3:16:40 PM PDT by ameribbean expat

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: miss marmelstein

Regarding the bones of the small children discovered in the tower, do you have any ideas who they may have been?

Supposing the boys were murdered, I’ve seen both Margaret Beaufort and Henry VII listed as the possible guilty party with one historian leaning towards Henry. Thoughts on this? After study, I’m starting to find Richard III a much more sympathetic character, and dont believe he had need to murder the boys.

I find the War of the Roses captivating history. It’s doubly so since my genealogy shows descent from major players of this time-—if the genealogy is correct. Ha.


41 posted on 03/22/2016 5:10:47 PM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: navymom1
Regarding the bones of the small children discovered in the tower, do you have any ideas who they may have been?

Maybe they were Pages to the King. Pretty plausible, since I don't think Richard III had any inkling Bosworth was going to go that bad that day.

42 posted on 03/22/2016 5:16:32 PM PDT by catfish1957 (I display the Confederate Battle Flag with pride in honor of my brave ancestors who fought w/ valor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: navymom1

There’s no evidence that they were the bones of very small children — one of the problems uncovered when they were examined by forensics guys (1930s?) was that they were remains of individuals too old to have been the princes if they’d died during the reign of Richard III. Also, there was no scientific dating. Also, the find spot wasn’t all nice and neat, and other partial remains were ignored. It’s not unlikely that they were from a burial ground, and could well have been much older remains, perhaps Dark Ages, perhaps Roman, perhaps pre-Roman.


43 posted on 03/22/2016 5:21:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: centurion316; miss marmelstein

Richard III had zero motive for killing the princes, they’d been delegitimized by the Titulus Regius.

Henry VII had the children of Richard’s elder brother relegitimized and the Titulus Regius copies burned (one happened to survive in obscurity and was rediscovered in the past century), so he could (and did) marry their sister, but the princes obviously had a better claim at that point — apart from the fact that he’d already had them killed.


44 posted on 03/22/2016 5:25:42 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: all the best

Saw a show on it just a few weeks ago.

***
I would love to see that show. Do you have the info so that I could search for it?


45 posted on 03/22/2016 5:27:36 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Keep calm and Pray on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: navymom1

It’s a fascinating period with so many interesting characters. Richard the Third is a very sympathetic character. A beloved figure in England until the Woodvilles decided to kill him.

The bones in the urn were discovered in the 17th century along with animal bones and broken pottery when doing excavation at the Tower. It was assumed, without any evidence, that they were the two boys. They were examined in the 1930s by a dentist. He thought they were too young to be able to identify their sex. One had serious bone disease in its jaw. There is no evidence that either of the princes had such an illness. Many bones have turned up at the tower site because it was inhabited for centuries and was originally a fort. Some think the bones may have been from the Roman era.

The Queen refuses to have the bones reexamined.


46 posted on 03/22/2016 5:35:32 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The problem also is if the bones in the urn were identified as the princes, it still doesn’t tell us who had them killed - or if they were indeed killed. We do know from the 1930s examination that the bones didn’t show anything unusual except disease of the jaw in one of them.


47 posted on 03/22/2016 5:38:16 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Check Post 4 and see if you’d like your daughter or mother to get a message like that. I was not on this thread when I received that. I’m not even sure why this two year old story is alive and well again.


48 posted on 03/22/2016 5:40:21 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I did mention that the Tudors wrote the stories. I’m a Plantagenet descendant, not the Tudors, the Stuarts or all of the Germans, so I won’t defend the rumors.


49 posted on 03/22/2016 5:42:52 PM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

I didn’t say that the target of your invective didn’t have it coming- he certainly did. I am just admiring your effectiveness.


50 posted on 03/22/2016 5:43:23 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Ah, well, then, I apologize.


51 posted on 03/22/2016 5:45:17 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Turks (Muslims))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
Bravo!
52 posted on 03/22/2016 5:56:56 PM PDT by kitchen (If you are a luthier please ping me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Whew! I can take a breather from my digging. A lot of granite around here.


53 posted on 03/22/2016 5:57:31 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

XLNT


54 posted on 03/22/2016 6:00:23 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

That is a very cool scan.


55 posted on 03/22/2016 6:02:13 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

I’m also Plantagenet descent if the genealogy is correct. I’m verified to the Morgans in Wales.


56 posted on 03/22/2016 6:31:26 PM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Thanks for the info. Truly am engrossed by this era of history. Also spend a lot of time reading about Custer at The Little Big Horn.


57 posted on 03/22/2016 6:33:27 PM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

Boy wouldn’t it be fun to time travel back in history and solve some of these mysteries?


58 posted on 03/22/2016 6:34:37 PM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ZULU; miss marmelstein

So Zulu you think VII or his nutty mom and not poor Gloucester the maligned?

I just read a lot on it

The recent Thames production on Thomas Cromwell was really good

And the Starz series on Woodville ditto


59 posted on 03/22/2016 6:51:00 PM PDT by wardaddy (Cruz path to nomination is a box canyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

That’s a disgusting thing to say and you should be embarrassed, but I doubt that you are. SHAME ON YOU AND YOU’RE VULGAR POST !


60 posted on 03/22/2016 6:52:09 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson