Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Problem with Trump’s Protectionist Tariffs
National Review ^ | March 8, 2016 | Jim Geraghty

Posted on 03/08/2016 7:31:07 AM PST by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: reaganaut1
Mygosh, I'm doing a reality check. Lets say I buy a designer label sweatshirt made in China. Won't happen. Instead I'll buy a high-quality 100% cotton sweatshirt made in the US, American Giant for example. You know what? Same price. And how about all of those made in China sneakers with endorsements? Hundreds of dollars.

It does seem that a real lot of the "saved" money is going into someone else's pockets. Meanwhile, where it isn't going is the pockets of US workers.

Globalism is a race to the bottom for a very high percentage of world-wide population.

21 posted on 03/08/2016 7:51:44 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adeKc6dbsI0

Maybe if you heard it right from Trump, you might look at it from a different angle...


22 posted on 03/08/2016 7:53:57 AM PST by HarleyLady27 ('THE FORCE AWAKENS!!!' Trump; Trump; Trump; Trump; 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I am generally opposed to tariff’s; however, in a “tariff free paradise” we would have a sane, non-corrupt regulatory environment, we would not allow countries using slave labor, government subsidies and currency manipulation to bludgeon American workers into submission to the “cheap labor express”. Also, free trade does not require multi-thousand page trade agreements (NAFTA for example). We do not have free trade in any respect. We have managed trade stacked in favor of establishment clients. Lately, I haven’t heard any free traders objecting to tariff’s on cane sugar or sugar based ethanol imports. BTW, I have been an academic and industry economist for over 45 years, my opinion isn’t strictly based on emotion.


23 posted on 03/08/2016 7:55:22 AM PST by TheConservativeBanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Make it here, hire Americans => NO TARIFF
The author sounds pro-foreign labor.


24 posted on 03/08/2016 7:56:50 AM PST by Suz in AZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Wow....National Review are staffed with idiots.....Trumps political declarations are the beginning of negotiations.....

Hardline over-the-top stance...move slightly back for great concessions....sign deal....

They (Chinese, et al) have to believe he’ll either go back and get stronger tariffs or stick firm....


25 posted on 03/08/2016 7:58:04 AM PST by nevergore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magua

Agree. So what is Japan’s tires become a better deal?

As long as our balance of trade improves with bi-lateral negotiations .


26 posted on 03/08/2016 7:58:15 AM PST by fooman (Get real with Kin Jung mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Tariffs reduce the purchasing power of consumers by much more than they raise it for workers in the protected industries, and they cost jobs in our export industries when other countries retaliate.

Yep. We charge a tariff on Chinese goods, they retaliate by charging a tariff on US goods. Prices go up and consumers pay more for everything. Demand for products fall when prices rise and we loose more jobs.

27 posted on 03/08/2016 8:00:53 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbynack
We charge a tariff on Chinese goods, they retaliate by charging a tariff on US goods.

Birdbrain China already heavily tariffs our exports. Quit spreading the Free Traitor™ manure.

28 posted on 03/08/2016 8:02:39 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Donglalinger
Those images may convey your dislike of National Review, but they aren't very useful in addressing the point of this article.

Many free market advocates have made the point that trade deficits are not bad. Here are three articles by Walter E. Williams arguing that case.

Refute them if you will, but your post is essentially an ad hominem attack on National Review, instead of a reasoned response to a compelling argument. Let's remember that conservatives are supposed to be the reasonable ones. Leftists are the ones who respond with ad hominem attacks to arguments that they cannot rationally refute.

Trade Deficits: Good or Bad?

Our Trade Deficit

Worry Over Trade Deficits

29 posted on 03/08/2016 8:03:06 AM PST by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
National Review doesnot get it, because they do not want to get it.

Trumps's comments on tariffs are almost always linked to discussions of negotiating more favorable trade deals for us. They are a bargaining chip.

National Review since the 1960s has tended to sneer at Conservatives who did not accede to the NR version of what was a politically correct (or acceptable to them) stand. For a long time, more complete Conservatives tolerated their "attitude, because they did a lot of good with come college aged moderates, who were tilting in our direction. Lately, there has seemed less justification for tolerating their attitude. On the subject of Trump they continue to miss the essential points to no good purpose.

My article, Trump: Metaphor For American Conservatism, frankly, is intended as a rebuke for their "reasoning."

30 posted on 03/08/2016 8:04:27 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Better to ease taxes, regulations, unions and other impediments to domestic production.

31 posted on 03/08/2016 8:04:58 AM PST by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Gee, must be a lotta young folks here.

Some of us grew up in an America that bought almost nothing from China. Or Japan, unless you counted cheap radios.

Oddly everything seemed to work. And it was affordable.

Houses, cars, radios, airplanes, even tires...

Now guys like you tell me that an enemy country that we have only been doing business with for 30 years is “indispensable” and that this is the “conservative” position.

We used to call it Trading With the Enemy and it was a serious Federal crime.

Funny how age colors your thoughts.


32 posted on 03/08/2016 8:05:02 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

Buy Made in USA and eliminate the gloBULList cabal middle men.


33 posted on 03/08/2016 8:05:40 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: magua

Yes. Unlike the deliberate ignorance at NR, you clearly understand what is involved.


34 posted on 03/08/2016 8:06:03 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Quit spreading the Free Traitor™ manure

That is EXACTLY what this clown is doing

35 posted on 03/08/2016 8:06:16 AM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

National Review notoriously has it in for Trump, which makes it difficult to trust anything they say about him.


36 posted on 03/08/2016 8:06:25 AM PST by Jack Hammer (uff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mbynack

Don’t agree.

Free trade is great as long as it is fair trade. Most of our trading ‘partners’ screw us - there is very little fair trade.

The US is a huge market and we do not really need external trade. We should raise tariffs with each country until we reach a balanced trade position with them. And those few countries that run deficits with us should do the same.

We cannot continue to run trade deficits. That is permanent wealth transfer.

I get that free markets are best. But we don’t have free markets. We have manipulated markets that we can no longer tolerate.


37 posted on 03/08/2016 8:06:40 AM PST by TheTimeOfMan (Three Percenter - Cruz/West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

IBTSHL = In Before the Smoot-Hawley Lie.


38 posted on 03/08/2016 8:07:51 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

NR discredited itself as an honest news source, no different from the NY Daily news. If you still wish to read their daily Trump hit piece feel free, I choose to expose them for what they are.


39 posted on 03/08/2016 8:10:44 AM PST by Donglalinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The depression started with the Smoot-Hawley tariffs and the resulting trade (tariff) wars. Tariffs, though they sound good, are no panacea.

Ways to help the working man.

Reduce the corporate income tax to a rate that is competitive in the world. That way US corporations can compete better.

Let unions fade away. Unions do not help the consumer. If you’re not competing for consumers, they will shop elsewhere.

Check job-killing environmental laws. Do they really help the environment? CO2 is necessary for plant life on earth, and the EPA calls it a pollutant. Check job-killing environmental laws again. Are they worth it?

Get rid of Obamacare as it kills jobs.

Stop attacking the 1%, 10% and so on. Private sector investment has always been a major source of our prosperity.

Get rid of Fannie Mae as their meddling in finance and housing gave us a financial and housing crisis and drove us into the great recession.

Stop illegal immigration. Americans should not have to compete against foreigners on US soil.

Reduce excessive regulation. This applies to more industries than you or I know. For one, allow more medical schools and American born doctors. Regulation is especially hard on small business. There are economies of scale in dealing with regulations and regulators. So it is the biggest companies that skate by as others go belly-up.

For black Americans especially - allow the minimum wage to fade away. It cuts off the bottom rungs of the ladder of success. It drives up teen, especially black teen, unemployment.


40 posted on 03/08/2016 8:12:50 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson