Alveda King says to vote for candidates who oppose abortion and Planned Parenthood

As we come to the end of Black History month, the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King is encouraging everyone to vote for candidates who oppose abortion and the Planned Parenthood agenda. Dr. Alveda King, the niece of civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King said in a written statement that not voting is not an option for her because too many people paid a heavy price for that right:

“Not voting is not an option. Too many people in the suffragette and race wars in the U.S. (including my dad Rev. AD King, my uncle, ML King, and yes, me) struggled, and some even died for the right to vote.”

Alveda King has been an outspoken advocate for preborn children whose lives are targeted for death through abortion. She often compares their struggle for life as a civil right just as that of the African American community her Uncle, MLK, stood up to defend in the 1960’s. She also promotes the healing between the races and a spirit of love and unity to stand for those being targeted the same way her uncle did when the Black community was targeted. She warns those who will listen to focus on the real issues that matter and not the political spin:

“America needs healing… Beware the spin games. Pray and vote for life because our generations are depending on deliverance.”

Today, Alveda King said she is committed to casting her vote for the person who is most aligned with her views. Like many pro-lifers these days, it can be a difficult task to select the right candidate for political office because they often fall short of standing firmly against abortion in every case.

“During past elections I “wrote in” names for candidates because of personal, or philosophical reasons, I couldn’t stomach some who received nominations,” Alveda said in her written statement. She called promises from certain candidates, an emotional spin trap:

“Often politicians make unenforceable promises that make people feel good. We applaud those promises from candidates we like, because they strike a feel good chord. On the other hand, we attack those seemingly impossible unfulfilled promises from candidates we don’t prefer, because we want them to lose so that our candidates can win. It’s all an emotional spin trap.”

Alveda has worked hard to expose the eugenics history of Planned Parenthood. She has called the targeting of abortion in the Black community paramount to Black Genocide. But today, given all that is at stake in today’s election, she has vowed to vote for the person that is most against the abortion agenda and who will oppose Planned Parenthood:

“This time around, I’m committed to voting for whoever is against the abortion agenda and Planned Parenthood’s role in abortion on some level and who receives the nomination for the party who is most against abortion.”

“I’m just going to vote for the one most closely aligned to the position that human life of mothers and their babies is valuable from conception or fertilization until natural death (no abortion and no euthanasia for babies, poor, sick and infirm people); and that life and the liberty to be born is a human, moral and civil right.”

This article reminds me of the letter I send each year to commentators and papers.

From: Retain Mike
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 11:56 AM
To: ‘yourletters@washingtontimes.com‘
Subject: Roe v. Wade and Black History Month

Black History Month reminds people Democrats professed an apparent contradiction as they seceded to begin the Civil War. They demanded protection for slavery where existing, and the right to take their "property" into the territories. They demanded the right to trade their "property" across state lines, and enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law. Yet during the last heated debates and for years prior, these same people joined the near universal condemnation of the international slave trade.

This contradiction vanishes when understanding the South was being overrun with their "peculiar property" Democratic Senator Alfred Iverson of Georgia said before Congress in 1861, "We know well that we never can enjoy equal possession of the territories without protection of our property.... They increase, according to the last census bill, at the rate of 32% every ten years. Meaning the South needed new slave states and plantations to absorb the increasing population.

One hundred fifty years later the Black Community provides voting plurality to the Democrat Party, and adopts their Pro-Choice sacrament of abortion. According to the Centers for Disease Control, black women accounted for about 36% of abortions, though blacks constitute about 14% of total population. Applying antebellum population growth to the post Roe v. Wade period would mean 68 million blacks instead of the 45 million currently living.

So what benefits accrue for blacks providing the Democrat Party about 90% voting support, compared to a mandate for contributing 60% of their humanity to enrich the Democrat slave master's political status?

Partial bibliography:

The History Civil, Political, & Military of the Southern Rebellion: Volume 1, Page 75

Constitution of the Confederate States of America (Article 1, Section 9 (1)
http://www.usconstitution.net/csa.html
22,560,000x1.32=29,779,200; 29779,200x1.32=39,308,554; 39308554x1.32=51,887,278
51,887,278x1.32=68,491,207

Roe v. Wade January 22, 1973
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade

African American Population
http://www.blackdemographics.com/

CDC Abortion Surveillance 2011 (Table 12)
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6311a1.htm?s_cid=ss6311a1_w

Black Demographics.com
http://blackdemographics.com/population/

Is Abortion Overused in the Black Community?
http://www.theroot.com/views/blacks-and-roe-v-wade

Why Are Black Women Three Times More Likely to Have an Abortion?
http://www.all.org/article/index/id/MTExNzU

“Whitey has the power to stop abortion. So yes... blame whitey.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Roe vs Wade.
Doe Vs Bolton

Jane Roe aka Norma McCorvey white

Mary Doe aka Sandra Cano white

Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee the lawyer that helped push both cases. Both white.

All 12 supreme court justices in 1973, well what do you know? all white!

Cecile Richards the current head of the organization that does “wonderful things” Planned Parenthood is white.

The founder Margaret Sanger was white.

So yes you are correct...Miss King may blame whitey and does have a case.

I respectfully question if Dr King understands that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for anything like Planned Parenthood.

But until the states wise up to the idea that they’re being duped by the corrupt feds with respect to such funding, federal politicians unconstitutionally appropriating taxes to fund Planned Parenthood abortions probably just to win votes, by asking voters to support anti-abortion candidates, Ms King is basically doing the best thing that be done at this time to put a stop to abortion imo.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.