Posted on 03/01/2016 3:17:55 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past
Donald Trump's affection for the Mussolini statement, "It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep." reveals a mindset very much at odds with the Framers of our U.S. Constitution.
To the Framers, power was something they wanted to minimize, in every government office and officeholder.
Patrick Henry said, "Power is the great evil with which we are contending. We have divided power between three branches of government and erected checks and balances to prevent abuse of power.
Thomas Jefferson worried about abuse of power in the Judicial Branch. He said, ""The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone."
Jefferson saw the role of the President as being administrator of the Constitution, a Constitution belonging to the people and in accord with its original meaning. He said, "The Constitution on which our Union rests, shall be administered by me [as President] according to the safe and honest meaning contemplated by the plain understanding of the people of the United States at the time of its adoption -- a meaning to be found in the explanations of those who advocated, not those who opposed it, and who opposed it merely lest the construction should be applied which they denounced as possible."
Thomas Paine worried about executive power when he wrote the pamphlet, "Common Sense." He said, "But where says some is the king of America? I'll tell you Friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the Royal of Britain. Yet that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly honors, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth placed on the divine law, the word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know, that so far as we approve of monarchy, that in America the law is king. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people whose right it is. "
Samuel Adams noted his distaste for a strongman lion leader when, after all the delegates signed the Declaration of Independence in 1776, he said: "We have this day restored the Sovereign to Whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in Heaven and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His Kingdom come."
The Declaration itself was a detailed list of grievances against a lion leader. A portion of that sentiment was this: "The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world."
After listing their grievances they stated this: "We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown..."
Instead of a strongman, the Founders of this Nation considered the only hands in which our liberty was safe were the Hands of God. As Jefferson said, "Can the liberties of a nation be sure when we remove their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people, that these liberties are the gift of God?"
They believed that our Nation was blessed, not because of its own goodness, but because of God's grace and our dependence on Him. Benjamin Franklin: said The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?
Notice the lack of self pride and arrogance in these men? They were students of history and deep thinkers. They understood the danger of power in the hands of corruptible men. They believed that power and glory belonged to the Creator, not the President.
Mr Trump, being the self proclaimed good Christian that he is, ought to know, the Bible teaches pride comes before destruction; humility comes before honor; that it is better for another to tout your accomplishments, rather than brag about yourself; that God commands we humble ourselves before Him; that it is His greatness and honor and glory we should seek, not our own; that God will bless the meek and punish the proud and defiant; that vengeance belongs to God, not to Donald Trump.
Right and wrong are not the flip side of winning and losing. Mussolini's lion like power was an evil power. Right and wrong are revealed in the understand of the difference between good and evil. That sort of wisdom is understood over time, by a careful self examination and effort to inform ones conscience, preferably with wisdom from above shown through the light of history. People who show signs of possessing that wisdom do not dwell on their own greatness, but they are able and willing to admit when they are wrong.
God is the only one who can make America great again. Unless we "restore the Sovereign to whom all men ought to be obedient" it will never happen.
Mr. Trump, maybe you have been reading the wrong experts.
“OK...The quote from Mussolini is not really the point, it is used as a vehicle to contrast Trump bombastic character versus the Founding Fathers character ...
How many of our founding fathers would be voting for Trump ?
I think not many...”
There is one part of your post I agree with “I think not” what a stupid post...do you really think you got this down? You are just brainwashed by the same group who has controlled who is in office for decades now...there are a large and growing group of us who have been freed from that. The fact that both parties elites are against Trump is proof of the revolution going on. Trump leads the next generation Tea Party movement.
Opps
Well this has to be the dumbest post yet. The founding fathers who were wealthy men. Risked everything declaring war on the most powerful country in the world. Yet you say they weren’t living like Lions. Wow that is seriously stupid.
Sorry for the name calling, just woke up.
Good on ye!
Respect and civility go a long way, regardless of our differences of opinion.
LMAO!!! Trump as Churchill???
We’ll file that one with the comparisons to Jesus, Moses, Washington, Jefferson and Gen. Patton.
He may very well win the nomination, but let’s not get too carried away here.
“How many of our founding fathers would be voting for Trump?”
LOL. I bet all of them.
This article is completely misguided and stupid.
Trump will operate within the framework of the constitution. If he doesn’t, congress can remove him from power.
The article is suggesting that POTUS needs to be a weak man to preserve our freedom. BS.
Weak presidents will be exploited by Putin, by the Chinese, by the Arabs, etc. They will be abused in the world stage and will be left with nothing.
Which part of Roman government do you asteem?
If the quote is acceptable then defend the quote, but stating that it was Roman imperial tyranny that fostered it, not fascist Mussulini, doesn’t really address the issue.
We have not been governed by people who submit to the rule of the Constitution for more than 100 years.
And, by surrendering to them out of decorum, we are permitting the nation to go out of existence.
Enough.
What you think and what the reality might be, if it were even possible, may not be the case.
I think our Founders would absolutely be upset if they were to miraculously return. I think given their desire to be free means they would support Trump.
But either speculation is that, speculation, and nothing more. It is not only a useless, but a fool hardy, exercise in futility.
Actually the quote goes back to Roman time, nice tey moron
Maybe someone that cannot spell try should not be calling another person a moron.
I’ve read a great deal written by and about W.S. Churchill. Trump is not Churchillian in any fashion.
Give Teddy Roosevelt a heavy dose of arrogance and the morals of an alley cat and you’d be getting close.
Like they removed Clinton and Obama.
But he did see the Nazi threat to civilization ahead of most of his contemporaries, in the same way that Trump sees the threat from Islam.
I don’t know what ‘experts’ Trump uses, but he’s BEATING THE CRAP OUT OF THE GOPe and has TOTALLY NEUTERED Bill Clinton.
I’d say they’re PRETTY DARN GOOD experts and he’ll, most likely, bring them in to run the country next year.
Instead of tearing down Trump they should instead concentrate upon posting positive things about the candidate they support. Why are they not doing that? Because they have no real positive from which they can pull from. Thus they are left with only the attempts to impugn Trump and his supporters. At some point, realization that trying to discount their attacks with civility does not suffice nor abate the attacks, so civility takes a walk.
I honestly am starting to believe they are GOPe plants.
“It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep.”
I like the quote and I don’t care who said it.
You miss the point of my post. The whole concept of our republic is that we the people are the government. God is our only Sovereign and the Constitution our contract. Our 3 EQUAL branches of government are administrators of it. Public servants. Our representatives.
The last thing we need is Trump to bring in his “you can’t lose with the stuff I use” (Rev. Ike) style experts to run the country. We need guardians of the Constitution, not bullies to push around the other branches of government.
I slapped those quotes together in a hurry, wanting to get it posted early since this is Super Tuesday. I was hoping Trumpkins would see the contrast and stop before all is lost. I knew there was not much chance. I doubt many even read the quotes.
One day as a lion does not a Mussolini make.
What’s wrong with bombastic? Our founders had plenty of that element in their character. So?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.