[Califreak]

Interesting.

[Dilbert San Diego]

But is she liberal enough to suit Obama? Obama can only appoint rabid liberals.......

[albie]

These people never quit with their racist bs. “Bring native americans...” stfu.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

:: began her career as a victim-witness advocate ::

And she’s native American!
So am I.
[spit]

[odawg]

Yep. Diversity. That is the ticket. Screw ability, that is so much white privilege. This is a brave new world.

We will need a woman, a black, a gay, a transgender, an Asian, a Jew, an Hispanic, another gay (lesbian), and a communist.

Then we can all sit back and await the approaching utopia.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Skipping right from District Court, which is a trial court position, to the Supreme Court? Without any experience writing appellate opinions at the state or federal level, or significant experience practicing g before such courts??

Uh, no. Not qualified.

[Donglalinger]

Not a chance Obama will nominate but there is one Indian he might like.

[Don Corleone]

You can bet that anyone Obama nominates will not be a constitutional constructionist but more than likely a constitutional deconstructionist. The left hates the Constitution and what it does to hamper their plans to assume total power. If the Pubbies do not stop him they will be accomplices to the ruination of the Founders plans.

[MarvinStinson]

If the lefty Huffington Post recommends her you can imagine what she is.

[dangus]

The notion that she’s been vetted because she already serves as a federal judge is rather silly. That there needs to be a Native American seat on the Supreme Court is really silly. (Seriously? By the time you give a black seat, a Cuban seat, a Mexican-American seat, a Jewish seat, a Moslem seat (You KNOW that’d be coming), a Pacific-American seat, a Native-American seat, a LGBTQ seat (apart from the wise Latina... we can’t have multiple check-boxes filled by one person! That’s cheating!), and an Asian-American seat, there’ll be no seat for white gentiles!) I really don’t think the public is going to buy that there needs to be an American-Indian seat.

The only thing interesting about this proposal is precisely why Obama will never fulfill it: she may not be a radical leftist. And if he does appoint her, we know he knows something we don’t.

[albie]

These people never quit with their racist bs. “Bring native americans...” stfu.

[doug from upland]

BWAHAHAHAHA. I called a Native America several days ago --

[NorthMountain]

NOT interested.

DO NOT WANT.

Away with it.

[clearcarbon]

Comrade obama's pattern been to start with the worse possible candidate and then move along to someone only slightly less putrid.

I'm surprise he wastes time searching for domestic communist candidates when he could find exactly what he's looking for by importing one from Cuba or North Korea and calling them a eligible citizen.

[CarmichaelPatriot]

I don’t care about a nominee’s gender, race, ethnicity, religion or any other identity component.

I care about the one quality that Scalia was described as - A STRICT CONSTRUCTIONIST.

I don’t want someone who applies their own unique perspective, experience, values or whatever. I want someone who interprets laws based on what the founders wrote and that only.

[grania]

Having a Native Born American as the tie-breaker could bring an interesting dimension to deliberations. Can’t see how the ‘pubs could get everyone to oppose the nomination.

[Amendment10]

The problem with nominating ANY judge to the Supreme Court these days is that even the so-called conservative judges have evidently been indoctrinated with post-FDR era, state sovereignty-ignoring interpretations of the Constitution.

In fact, patriot FReepers could probably do a better of deciding Supreme Court cases than institutionally-indoctrinated justices can.

” 3. The Constitution was written to be understood by the voters; its words and phrases were used in their normal and ordinary as distinguished from technical meaning; where the intention is clear, there is no room for construction and no excuse for interpolation or addition.” - United States v. Sprague, 1931.

[raybbr]

The author:

Advice from this guy? Seriously?

[Ray76]

Demographic as a qualification. What bunk.

[Brian Griffin]

The court issues the left want to win are:
1. your guns gone
2. campaign finance (no one should ever be able to raise enough to beat Hillary)
3. unconstitutional scofflaw naturalizations blessed
4. plus all the other stuff remains in their trophy bag

[Organic Panic]

Hmmm. Would a Hopi support the federal government over reach after the federal government has violated just about every single treaty with the Native Americans? Will she support bigger government with the stellar record of how well the federal government cares for Native Americans?

Silly me. A liberal is a liberal uber alles.