Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 20yearsofinternet

Once again you are twisting what I said. I did not say the judge banned an autopsy. The judge ruled the death as natural causes (over the phone) and did not order an autopsy. SHE IS A DEMOCRAT, THEREFORE HAS A BUILT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST IN THIS CASE. My comparison is precise. The left would demand an autopsy and toxicology report in a reversed situation.

The family is in grief and were given the information based on what that democrat judge ruled. They are in no condition to make a decision like this.


63 posted on 02/14/2016 10:35:52 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Well it appears that you’re for giving the government some pretty sweeping authority to just start butchering people’s remains against the wishes of their surviving family based on specious reasoning.

I hope I never live to see the day where this opinion is widely shared. And if I do live to see it, I hope I don’t die of a heart attack in bed with a pillow.


72 posted on 02/14/2016 10:43:54 PM PST by 20yearsofinternet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson