Obviously there is no evidence he was murdered. There is also no evidence he wasn’t. Why did a democrat judge not even how up before deciding it was “natural causes” and that no autopsy was warranted? Given the political ramifications which she should have been fully aware of, and given that she is on the opposition side ideologically, she should have been required to order an autopsy. This stinks.
I am not sure that a judge is qualified to determine a person is legally dead.
It would seem someone with a medical degree of some sort should be involved in that.
Lack of evidence is not proof of anything. If he was murdered I expect God will take care of it and extract his own revenge. Meanwhile we have an election to win and don’t nead to veer off in this questionable conspiracy.
She followed Texas law, I read. No actual examination is needed.