Lack of evidence is not proof of anything. If he was murdered I expect God will take care of it and extract his own revenge. Meanwhile we have an election to win and don’t nead to veer off in this questionable conspiracy.
Again, I never said a lack of evidence was proof of anything. But think about that. It is not proof of anything EITHER WAY. That is why an autopsy and toxicology report should be required. That is how you stop questions. Get facts. Why not?
Lack of evidence is not proof of anything. If he was murdered I expect God will take care of it and extract his own revenge. Meanwhile we have an election to win and don’t nead to veer off in this questionable conspiracy.
________________________________________
Hey Einstein, asking that an autopsy be performed for a death of a Supreme Court Justice is not fostering a “conspiracy”, it’s ruling out foul play for a death that could possibly be suspicious. You don’t suspend common sense and what’s right just because we have an election.
An autopsy needs to be performed.
“Meanwhile we have an election to win and don’t nead to veer off in this questionable conspiracy.”
Welcome to Free Republic. It was nice of you to join us only 7 years into Obama’s reign of terror. Were you too young to join earlier? Didn’t know about the site? Just curious.
Maybe we need a little more clarity on the suspicious timing of a death that completely tips the scales of power on the level of a political coup. The nation deserves this much.
This election may just be about who replaces Scalia.