What you’re effectively saying is that you don’t want the Supreme Court to make a definitive decision on it then (one that you would not like, given the court’s make up).
That same Supreme Court to whom the US Constitution specifically gives the power to arbitrate issues between states, and determine ‘Constitutionality’ of laws (under which this question would fall I presume)? [this is the operative aegis the framers gave the USSC in the Constitution]
seems to me it might be a decision that none of us would really care for.
If the court were composed of American jurists who abided by the Constitution, and who were not leftist, activist oligarchs, then yes, I’d be all for it.