Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Windflier

What you’re effectively saying is that you don’t want the Supreme Court to make a definitive decision on it then (one that you would not like, given the court’s make up).

That same Supreme Court to whom the US Constitution specifically gives the power to arbitrate issues between states, and determine ‘Constitutionality’ of laws (under which this question would fall I presume)? [this is the operative aegis the framers gave the USSC in the Constitution]


89 posted on 02/06/2016 4:31:16 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

seems to me it might be a decision that none of us would really care for.


94 posted on 02/06/2016 4:36:23 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

If the court were composed of American jurists who abided by the Constitution, and who were not leftist, activist oligarchs, then yes, I’d be all for it.


102 posted on 02/06/2016 4:53:37 AM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson