Posted on 02/03/2016 12:54:31 PM PST by rickmichaels
Someone wrote this on facebook:
Microsoft conveniently loses the results in the six highly contested polls, then Hillary wins the six coin tosses in a row. Election officials say: "Hillary is just lucky." Less than 5,000 attend average Hillary events. 50,000 attend Sanders' events, but they are tied?
Cruz informs the caucus delegates that Carson has dropped out "...so join my caucus." Carson supporters join Cruz on mass. After the vote, Carson says, "WTF??? I never quit!!!"
Officials say: "Honest mistake from Cruz. No investigation needed."
This kind of massive corruption is well known, expected, and it is the reason why Trump will win.
Does anyone agree with this?
No.
The dogs have eaten the Christmas turkey. Who knows how it will all play through.
no
Some of it I do believe. Handing it over to Microsoft which is in the tank for Clinton was stupid.
As for Cruz staffers telling Carson voters he has dropped out and then spread by CNN too . Well I think there is more to the story than meets the eye, but at least Cruz did recognize this and said he was sorry. Now what will happen to those staffers?
You don’t think the facts about Clinton is true? WOW
Obvious Microsoft is for Clinton.
Cruz recognized the problem with his staffers and said sorry.
look we can ignore facts if you like but facts are facts.
Not hardly - ~50% fact and ~50% supposition.
No proof of this. In fact, the evidence strongly suggest the incident had no effect on the outcome at all.
Nope. Not after Donald Trump’s melt down today.
it is not his staffers that caused the most problems with the tweet. It was Steve King. I doubt Cruz admonished him.
How many Cruz supporters would switch because some kind of rumor? I don’t buy that,
No
None of us know all the facts, but a freeper did place a post from a Carson voter saying he was told off a staffer that Carson had dropped out and Cruz was their best bet.
I think Cruz acted as a gentleman and said he was sorry when he could have tried to deny it.
It’ll help.
On mass?
Oh vey.
Assuming the author meant "en masse" - what evidence does he have to support this? We don't know that a single Carson supporter altered his vote over this rumor, and if some did, we don't know if they went for Cruz, or Trump, or Rubio, or Jeb, or Charlie Fckin Chan.
No do-overs for babies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.