Posted on 12/08/2015 11:50:13 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda
White House Says âGrotesqueâ Donald Trump âDisqualifiedâ over Muslim Immigration Comments, Mocks His Hair
President Barack Obamaâs spokesman angrily lashed out at Donald Trump for proposing a ban on Muslim immigration to the United States, and accused him of âoffensive blusterâ and âgrotesque and offensiveâ language.
âThe fact is, that what Donald Trump said yesterday disqualifies him from serving as president,â spokesman Josh Earnest said, suggesting to reporters that his words were fundamentally anti-American.
Earnest denounced Trumpâs âcarnival barker routineâ which included âoutright liesâ and mocked the Republican frontrunner for having âfake hair.â He said:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Does this refer that someone in the White House might even run down a copy of the Constitution and finally read it?
âFake hairâ. Liberals never can help themselves from starting petty cut downs. Whatâs next? âstupidheadâ? Actually, itâll be harsher. Look for âD-bagâ next.
WE could be in for a great hair “ cage match”
1st match The Donald vs Mr. Perfect hair John Kerry
2nd match The Donald vs Frank “ the Rug” Luntz
.............. insert your choices :):)
Wow, Trump has a way of forcing us to seeing these people with their panties down.
He is over a major target. That says everything!
So how come Obama is turning back Christian Syrians? To me this is the bigger question.
I’m no Trump fan, but this White House should probably not be discussing anyone’s qualifications for anything, ever.
I ust have missed that part of the Constitution that Obama is refering to which supposedly disqualifies a person based on what they say about foreigners.
It's this ENTIRE TREASONOUS Administration and our nose up your butt Congress letting a homosexual pervert man-boy destroy a nation thousands have paid the ultimate price to defend.
THAT'S WHAT REAL 'GROTESQUE' LOOKS LIKE, Earnest!!!
They should know all about disqualified in the White House.
How do you tell the difference. What vet process would affirm the difference between radical Muslim or Christian. I could claim to be anything and try to prove it. All Trump wants is a temporary halt to letting anyone in until we get our vetting act together. Something is wrong here and so far thousands of Americans have been killed and looks like more to come. ISIS is here! And King Obama is still letting them in.
Hey BOZO, back at ya’. Everything you say is offensive.
Don't forget the head injuries and medication use that would disqualify her from purchasing a firearm under Obama Administration rules.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
Worse:
Islam is a system of TOTAL control of a society:
Government Administration
Legal System
Commerce
Education
and Religion.
As such it is completely antithetical to the Constitution and American life.
If Islam were ONLY a religion, then the First Amendment MIGHT have some bearing. (In proper cultural & temporal context, the Constitution with the Bill of Rights was written for a Christian society - Congregational, Methodist, Roman Catholic, Baptist, Lutheran, etc.) Jews and others were tolerated with the implicit understanding that this was a Christian country.
However, Islam does not exist without Sharia. Islam tolerates no other religions, systems of governance, legal systems, etc. Islam will NEVER “Coexist”, no matter how many times you sing “Kumbaya” while roasting your S’mores round the campfire with your favorite Imam or Jihadi.
Islam advocates the violent overthrow of the US Constitution and government. (unless they can talk us into handing them everything on a silver platter.)
Islam means “Submission” and requires your submission to Allah, his Prophet and (once the dust settles from the internecine warfare) his Caliph.
Will Earnst also go after Marco Rubio and his receding hairline and comb-over? Why bother about hair? Doesn't matter to me if a person wears a wig or has a comb-over. It is their position on issues that concerns me.
DC Douche Rocket
HuH? Where’s YOUR birth certificate, Barry-o?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.