Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/19/2015 10:56:52 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
The Most Mind-Bending Fact I Learned in Physics

The cost of a PHD in it?

Just kidding.

2 posted on 11/19/2015 11:01:56 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

And there’s more...


3 posted on 11/19/2015 11:03:41 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18 - Be The Leaderless Resistance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Didn’t understand a word.

You’re a smart dude.

Now back to my Netflix B Horror Movie.


4 posted on 11/19/2015 11:04:39 PM PST by dp0622 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark.


5 posted on 11/19/2015 11:07:35 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Here’s something mind-bending about physics I’ve recently learned.

Einstein’s great dream was the “unified field theory,” under which the four fundamental forces of nature - electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear, and gravity - would all be seen to have descended from the same force.

At very high energies, Einstein believed, these four forces could be seen to have condensed out of the same fundamental force.

In the 1970s, particle accelerators of sufficient power were able to generate conditions under which the electromagnetic force and the weak nuclear force coalesced into one force, the electroweak force.

One of the great mysteries was the question of gravity, which is enormously weaker than the other forces.

I never thought I could understand anything about that one. But just recently, in pursuing my hobby of listening to physics lectures on YouTube, I came across an insight into this question that amazed me.

In order to understand this, you have to be aware of one of the basic features of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. That is that as an object of mass larger than zero approaches the speed of light, its mass increases. As its velocity gets very close to the speed of light, its mass increases dramatically.

Here’s the thing. In the very first nanoseconds of the big bang, the velocity of individual particles was so great, so close to the speed of light, that their individual masses were enormous. An individual quark could have a mass of millions of tons.

And this is the key. If subatomic particles have such enormous energies, their masses become enormous. So enormous that the force of gravity becomes comparable to the other forces.

The conditions for this to happen would only have existed for a tiny fraction of a nanosecond, something like a billionth of a nanosecond. But during that time, all four forces were of comparable strength, and in effect condensed out of the same fundamental force.

To me this is an awesome idea.


7 posted on 11/19/2015 11:14:03 PM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Stephen Crothers Destroys the Quackademic “Black Hole” & Relativity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRsGPq77X0Q


13 posted on 11/19/2015 11:45:31 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

This is more astronomy based vs physics, but I found the event interesting, and more evidence of the immeasurable and infinite nature of space.

On June 14th, 2014, Astronomers using a telescope at the McDonald Observatory, in Fort Davis,Texas spotted a Gamma-Ray burst. This was a rare explosion of a Super-Nova 12.Billion light years away.
Gamma-Ray Bursts release more energy in seconds than the sun in its’ entire 10 Billion year lifetime.
This particular event occured not long after the Big Bang.


14 posted on 11/19/2015 11:55:27 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

21 posted on 11/20/2015 2:15:34 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
"...light itself, the sole thing capable of travel at c"

Not even approximately true. This "physicist" should learn about the rest of the electromagnetic spectrum.

24 posted on 11/20/2015 3:51:36 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark.


25 posted on 11/20/2015 3:55:48 AM PST by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bump


28 posted on 11/20/2015 4:05:01 AM PST by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans stPatr a in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

If you are in the back of a rocket traveling the speed of light and you walk to the front have you exceeded the speed limit?


32 posted on 11/20/2015 4:24:25 AM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bkmk


33 posted on 11/20/2015 4:25:45 AM PST by glock rocks (I don't always talk to liberals, but when I do, I order the large fries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

PhD (a.k.a.- Piled High and Deep). Yeah give this scientist another gov’t grant.


39 posted on 11/20/2015 5:02:29 AM PST by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

So how did you post the whole article without the strange text? :)


42 posted on 11/20/2015 6:32:43 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It’s posts like this that make me really miss Radio Astronomer!

Ed


60 posted on 11/21/2015 6:42:10 PM PST by Sir_Ed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

bkmk


61 posted on 11/21/2015 6:54:14 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
But, over the course of their billions of years in transit to us, the space they inhabit along their path through the stars has grown more than 1000 times bigger since they were born.

Some theorists think the 13.7 billion year old universe is 156 billion light years wide, which seems impossible. Nothing in reality is infinite so either the universe has an edge where light bounces back, or light curves until it starts heading back.


65 posted on 11/22/2015 11:30:07 AM PST by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson