Posted on 10/20/2015 2:01:06 PM PDT by conservativejoy
I thought when Ted Cruz was attacking the Supreme Court appoints of Bush Sr. and Bush Jr., he was making a substantive argument about picking genuine conservatives and fighting for them as opposed to picking those easier to get past the Senates nomination process. After all, a lot has happened since Roberts was appointed to the court as hes turned out to be a disaster and this is definitely something worth pointing out.
But apparently to Rove that was almost criminal, especially since Cruz didnt include Reagans appointment in his criticism.
This was, by the way, his defense of George W. Bush going after Cruz when asked about it on Fox News this morning:
Mark Levin rips W. after last nights Politico report and also explains why the Bushes dont like Cruz and its not about his criticism of their SCOTUS appointments:
VIDEO and Audio at link
Looking back, the answer is absolutely nothing.
Let Karl whine. Those appointments should be brutally criticized! Anyone remember Harriet Miers? She showed how little Bush cared. He just wanted political cronies, not constitutional minded judges.
While in power the dems get sotomayer, and other marxists while G.W. tried to play nice and gave us Ropberts?
G.W., your compassionate conservatism is horse shit pal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.