Posted on 09/17/2015 10:33:37 AM PDT by conservativejoy
If the general environment fits Cruz nicely, the dynamic of the campaign is favorable to him, too.
Ted Cruz isn’t topping the polls or dominating the conversation, but he’s one of the winners of the past few months.
His odds of winning the nomination have increased more than anyone else’s besides Donald Trump, and if you believe (reasonably enough) that Trump isn’t built to last, more than anyone else’s, period.
Let’s review. There was always the danger of Cruz, who made his national reputation on the strength of a misbegotten government shutdown, seeming like too much of a bomb-thrower. That was before it began to look like the Republican Party is open to a candidate only slightly less disruptive than Auguste Vaillant, the 19th-century French anarchist who struck a blow against politics as usual by literally throwing a bomb into the French Chamber of Deputies in 1893 (the establishment wasn’t amused — it executed him).
Such is the disgust with the Republican leadership, that there is no longer such a thing as going too far. Cruz could burn John Boehner in effigy, and no one would bat an eye. Cruz could make a citizen’s arrest of Mitch McConnell on the Senate floor on grounds of gross crimes of omission against the constitutional republic, and the Luntz focus group would applaud his plucky initiative. In sum, there’s nothing Cruz could do short of pissing in the Yankee Bean soup in the Senate dining room that would be too outlandish, and even then his most devoted fans might say, “It’s about damn time."
This must be liberating for Cruz, who has already called McConnell a liar and blamed Boehner and McConnell for not stopping the Iran nuclear deal — and he’s just getting started.
If the general environment fits Cruz nicely, the dynamic of the campaign is favorable to him, too. There are few things Cruz should welcome more than the ongoing war between Trump, the anti-establishment gorilla in the room who is a major obstacle in his path, and the foremost establishment candidate, Jeb Bush, whom Cruz needs to be as weak as possible. Cruz can stand by and hope both sides lose, which isn’t a far-fetched bet.
While other campaigns have been flummoxed and discombobulated by the rise of Trump, Cruz hasn’t. He has a simple political True North — go where the base is. Once it became obvious Trump was catching on with the grass roots, Cruz’s play was obvious: Start acting as if Ronald Reagan’s only failure was not to have handed down a 12th Commandment — thou shalt not criticize Donald Trump.
Cruz can be very patient waiting for the mogul to come down to earth. The Texas senator has an ideological and geographical base that means he can play the long game.
Consider Iowa. Cruz is sitting in third place there, a comfortable place to be in the late-breaking state. He has captured the intense loyalty of a portion of the grass roots (evident in his consistently crowd-pleasing speeches) and lines up for the caucuses better than Trump does. Cruz is a preacher’s son who announced his campaign at Liberty University. He speaks forcefully on the social issues and is a down-the-line conservative, without a hint of a heterodoxy.
If he were to emerge and win Iowa, he would have a much stronger financial and institutional base to follow up his victory than the immediate past winners, Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee. Cruz has raised more hard money than anyone else, and has significant super PAC support. If he merely held his own until March 1, he’d be in position to sop up delegates in the SEC states, including Texas.
On top of this, Cruz is very smart, disciplined and doesn’t make unforced errors — if he gets an opening, he’ll make the most of it.
Getting that opening will depend on Trump and Ben Carson fading (and someone else, like Carly Fiorina, not rising). But all Cruz needs is for the voters to become slightly, and only slightly, more desirous of political experience.
The Overton window has shifted enough that Cruz, in the Senate less than three years, almost all of it spent in political pyrotechnics, looks like the sober statesman. Compared to Donald Trump, he’s practically Everett Dirksen. Compared to Carson, he’s a career politician — a veteran of the George W. Bush campaign and administration who ran for the U.S. Senate as soon as plausible, and apparently has no intention of leaving unless it’s for a promotion.
It once seemed that Scott Walker could best Cruz with his record of accomplishment, but so far Republican voters aren’t in an accomplishment mood. It’s possible to imagine Cruz’s team secretly thinking, “What good fortune that our candidate has never governed anything, or seriously tried to pass major legislation.”
Of course, Cruz’s potential may never be realized. He should, in theory, be the elected officeholder next in line to pick up support from the outsiders, but he is very different stylistically from them. While Trump always lets it fly extemporaneously, Cruz is extremely deliberate. While Trump and Carson ooze sincerity, Cruz can let his calculation show — he sincerely supported trade promotion authority, until the politics shifted, and then he sincerely opposed it. While Trump and Carson are refreshingly different as communicators, Cruz is practiced and stentorian. He could make ordering a ham-and-cheese sandwich sound like a speech. (Trump is also, in many respects, a raging moderate, whose support ranges much more widely across the party than Cruz’s.)
However shrewdly Cruz is positioned in the primary, his candidacy might be a heavy lift in a general election. But there’s time to worry about that later. Cruz certainly has a more intuitive theory of the case than Jeb Bush: to wit, you have to win the primary to have a chance to win the general.
Unlike Trump and Carson, Cruz doesn’t need the usual political rules to be utterly suspended to win the nomination. He just needs them to be different, and to get some lucky bounces along the way. That looks likelier than it did six months ago.
I am confused. I thought Cruz was some sort of debate expert.....lol......wow....obviously that was brought up by FREEPERS without actually seeing him debate.
Senator Cruz is playing this brilliantly.
He won’t win the nomination and good thing he would get obliterated in the general. But...some here love pyrrhic victories.
After the 2016 election, I'm going to take off from FR for a couple of years.
You are often and easily confused.
You’re right. You are confused. Cruz was a National Debate Champion two years in a row and has a debate event named for him at Princeton.
You’re right. You are confused. Cruz was a National Debate Champion two years in a row and has a debate event named for him at Princeton.
So why is he middle of the pack at best in these debates?
Agree with the article — and Cruz did nothing to hurt his cause last night. He’s not the one getting all the buzz, but he landed some nice blows. It was particularly satisfying to see him obliterate Kasich on the Iran deal exchange. I loved the split screen with Cruz speaking with authority while Kasich fidgeted around and looked completely frazzled.
At least I don’t lie about a candidate saying he is an expert in debating when he is not.
You are pathetic.
You are so right.
What has been pushed on us as debates for the past several decades are not DEBATES!
They are nothing more than shows geared to advance an agenda.
I want a Thunderdome type of debate. Neutral questions participants must answer directly and challenge opponents.
The debates now are wussyfied pieces of programing poo.
Cruz? Has been invisible since Trump’s announcement. Does he plan on doing something ANYTHING. Yes he is the favorite of hard core conservatives (including me). But he has to address the Nation.....first to beat every Republican in the Primaries ....then the whole country in the general.....but he is barely visible. If that’s his plan, it isn’t working.
He is a debate expert. What you watched last night was not a debate. Perhaps a candidate forum, but not a debate.
Who are you calling a liar? What is the lie you are accusing them of?
You’re right. You are confused. Cruz was a National Debate Champion two years in a row and has a debate event named for him at Princeton.
So why is he middle of the pack at best in these debates?
___________________________________
Well, these are far from academic debates. These are made-for-TV events.
It is what it is....we have known what debates are like forever....20 years at least and yet still people said that Cruz was going to win the debates because he is brilliant. That was way off and it was said numerous times here......if I had a nickel for every time someone said, “Cruz is going to crush them during the debates” or “Just wait till the debates, Cruz will gain traction and be our nominee”. I’d be a very rich man. Cruz is not a brilliant debater....maybe in college but this is the big leagues.
The snarky tone of this article is obnoxious, but on his main point the author is correct: Cruz is doing well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.