Posted on 08/22/2015 3:03:31 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Speaking to a crowd of more than 20,000 in Mobile, Alabama, Donald Trump had a confession to make: he may never eat Oreos again.
Trump, during his bid for the Republican presidential nomination, has been outspoken about his displeasure of American companies moving overseas to China and Mexico, and his sentiments were expressed in full once again during his campaign stop in Alabama Friday night.
“You know, Mexico is the new China,” Trump told the crowd, referencing the recent decision by Nabisco to move its factories there.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
That means that X-hundred Mexicans have jobs in Mexico and no reason to come here.
____________
Guess how much I care whether Mexicans have jobs? Zero.
That is the job of their Elite Government. Not ours. Not mine.
Where did I say that I cared whether they had jobs? I said they wouldn’t be coming here. Where did I say it was our government’s job to create jobs in Mexico? That’s what they’re doing now. I said I wanted our government to create more jobs here.
Is your reading comprehension always so pathetic?
You already posted the link to the article at the top it’s not necessary to post the url two posts later
Thanks for the laugh.
Your quote:
I always have mixed feelings when I hear that an American company has opened a new plant in Mexico hiring X-hundred workers. That means that X-hundred Mexicans have jobs in Mexico and no reason to come here.
Did you figure out what the means yet?
I’m eating Cookies n Cream ice cream tonight for desert.
Nabisco’s move says more about Chicago and Illinois than it does anything else.
Yes, I did, you can’t write worth jack.
Hydrox cookies bake plans for comeback
Bruce Horovitz, USA TODAY 6:45 a.m. EDT May 11, 2014
hydrox
(Photo: Leaf Brands)
4603
CONNECT
146
TWEET
46
LINKEDIN
126
COMMENT
EMAIL
MORE
The Oreo-buster is back.
Hydrox cookies, those Oreo-like chocolate sandwich cookies, could reappear on store shelves as early as September, says Ellia Kassoff, CEO of Leaf Brands, which recently acquired the rights to the unused Hydrox trademark.
“The cosmic difference between Hydrox and Oreo is that Hydrox is a little more crispy; a little less sugary and stands up better in milk,” says Kassoff, who will make the official announcement later this month at the Sweets & Snacks Expo in Chicago on May 20.
Even in a new world of nutritional consciousness, there is little evidence that America’s sweet tooth is fading. Sales of packaged cookies and baked goods are expected to top $17 billion by 2017 — up from $13 billion in 2012, reports Packaged Facts. While the return of Hydrox is expected to be a hit with Baby Boomers who may fondly remember the brand — formerly owned by Kellogg’s, Keebler and Sunshine — it may be a tougher sell with Millennials who are not very familiar with the cookie brand, which hasn’t been regularly sold on store shelves in almost a decade.
“We’ll use social media to reach out to Millennials,” says Kassoff. The 46-year-old CEO says that he likes to acquire old brands or trademarks that still have fans. “We recycle brands that get left on the side of the road.”
But the Hydrox brand has special meaning to him. As a young kid raised by parents who were Orthodox Jews, he was only permitted to eat Hydrox — not Oreos — because, he says, at the time, Oreos were not kosher but Hydrox were. Today, both are kosher.
The move by Leaf Brands — which also owns trademarks to Astro Pops, Wacky Wafers and Farts Candy — comes just two years after giant Oreo celebrated its 100th birthday. Little-known, however, is that Hydrox was the original creme-filled chocolate sandwich cookie when it debuted in 1908 — followed four years later by Oreo.
But executives at Mondelez, which owns the Oreo brand, are hardly showing any signs of concern. “Oreo is America’s favorite cookie,” says Laurie Guzzinati, a company spokeswoman. She declined to comment specifically on the return of Hydrox. Oreo sales, which exceed $2 billion globally and $1 billion in North America, have grown double-digits in the U.S. for the past two years.
Its been years since Oreo had a genuine rival on the shelf. Kellogg stopped making Hydrox in 2002. Then, in 2008, when Hydrox turned 100, Kellogg briefly resumed distribution, but only for a limited time.
Hydrox still has an online fan page, and a few months ago, Bill Burnett, of Salina, Okla., posted this wishful note about Hydrox: “My brother and I loved them. I never got a taste for the inferior “Oreo,” which was far less tasty as the wonderful Hydrox. I think I’ve only bought one package of them in 50 years! Bring Hydrox back again!”
In fact, says Kassoff, it’s fans like Burnett who convinced him to bring back the brand. “I hear from all of them,” he says. “I know millions of people are waiting for the product.”
But unlike the cookies giants, which typically must sell at least $100 million worth of a brand for it to be an even modest success, Burnett says he can sell a fraction of that and do just fine.
The pricing will be roughly where Hydrox was for years: less expensive than Oreos but more expensive than store brands. If a 14-ounce package of Oreos retails for about $4; Hydrox will be $3 and store brand sandwich cremes often cost about $2, he says.
But success won’t come simply. At least one brand guru says Hydrox has lots of work to do. “Oreo conveys round and is fun to say and hear. Hydrox sounds scientific and medicinal ... not appetizing at all,” says Steven Addis, CEO of Addis. “Oreo has become part of the fabric of America. Like Coke. This makes it somewhat unassailable, even from a superior product.”
The cookies will be made at a factory in Southern California, but Kassoff won’t say where. Maybe he doesn’t want the fans lining up outside the gates just yet. But later this summer, when the first pack rolls of the line, Kassoff has big plans for that one.
“It’s mine,” he says. “I’m going to sit down and share it with my family.”
It’s not my fault you’re a dumbass.
you continue to show your lack of talent with stringing words into sentences.
With an example like that I might be scratching pictographs on cave walls soon. lol
A LOT of this has to do with sugar tariffs.
Sugar wholesales for less than 50 cents/pound. It's far more likely that cheaper labor led to this decision.
We can't blame this on the unions either - they could have easily moved the facilities to a southern right to work state.
Shipping is cheap.So is wholesale sugar.
Nabisco’s move says more about Chicago and Illinois than it does anything else.Nabisco also bypassed every other site in the United States as well, including southern right to work states.
This is all about offshoring - nothing else.
I’m not getting it?
He just said last week it was OK for the Trump Ties, clothing to be manufactured in China because the nations policies forced him to.
I’m missing why it different for Nabisco?
I’ve started making my own oreo’s - there is a super recipe for chocolate sandwich cookies on the web. Excellent rich dark cocoa flavor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.