To: MinorityRepublican
She is a poor choice, she will be 46 if they launch on 2026, well past baby making age. Someone 26 would be a much better choice.
33 posted on
08/02/2015 5:52:47 PM PDT by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
To: jpsb
If you may not coming back, have infrequent resupply, and if there is a fair chance that you will be abandoned due to funding or mechanical failure, better a mature non fertile woman.
49 posted on
08/02/2015 6:15:36 PM PDT by
Pete from Shawnee Mission
("We shall stick it out to the end, but we are getting weaker... and the end cannot be far" R. Scott)
To: jpsb
Actually, someone who’s 16 now.
65 posted on
08/02/2015 6:44:18 PM PDT by
FrdmLvr
("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
To: jpsb
considering how much bone density she will lose in space, not like she can do anything physical f they even make it there.
83 posted on
08/02/2015 9:34:42 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson