Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345

“I am a frugal consumer and am always looking for the best value and to me upgrading every revision is foolish.”

I tend to skip at least two upgrades before upgrading my equipment - sometimes more.

My main point remains that Apple has a tremendous profit share of several industries.

“While Apple has just 7% of the share of revenue, it’s grabbing 35% of the operating profit. Deutsche Bank attributes it to the strength of the Mac/MacBook lineup. Other companies are losing profit margins because they have to pay Microsoft for software.”

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-revenue-vs-operating-profit-share-of-top-pc-vendors-2010-3#ixzz3gpjxP200

This is a fantastic business model. The goal of a business is to make a profit by creating value - as judged by the customer.

Against this is a telling statistic:

In 2014, the average profit of a Windows box manufacturer was just $14.87.

(http://bgr.com/2014/01/10/pc-profits-analysis-margins/)

That is a boatload of work and overhead to create $14.87 of profit per machine. This is why you can buy them cheaply. They are a commodity.

In all commodity businesses, only volume will count and average expenses continue to rise - healthcare, salary, operating expenses, fixed expenses. It sucks from a business point of view. It’s like being locked in a death spiral.

As a businessman and investor I will take the high profit margin business model for every business I buy or create. It makes life so much easier and operating the businesses more fun and profitable for us.

As a consumer/employee, I understand why you prefer to buy the commodity platforms. It is also why entire countries have switched to open source platforms.

I wish you the best.


65 posted on 07/24/2015 11:10:58 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion
I think the issue is more related to handhelds stealing the business away from the desktop and laptop markets and Apple dominating in the handheld market.

So the Apple software is free versus the MS software costs? Apple is open source? Linux is open source. Ah, you mean BSD. But isn't there a cost for the customized and maintained version of BSD? There is a free version but that is not the same version that is running on Apple computers.

And if there is a cost savings, apparently Apple is not passing this savings on to the consumer because that would be reflected in a lower unit cost which I am not seeing.

Also, it would be hard to believe consumers (or businesses) switching from low cost Windows laptops to very expensive Apple laptops. I know. I considered this option and the bang for the buck just isn't there for me. There is an obvious cost disparity between your typical Apple laptop and an MS/Windows version.

66 posted on 07/24/2015 11:59:11 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion; dhs12345
“While Apple has just 7% of the share of revenue, it’s grabbing 35% of the operating profit. Deutsche Bank attributes it to the strength of the Mac/MacBook lineup. Other companies are losing profit margins because they have to pay Microsoft for software.”

That was 2010, by 2014 Apple was taking home 51% of all PC makers' profits. . . with only 10% of the world's PC market share.

71 posted on 08/06/2015 7:33:50 PM PDT by Swordmaker ( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson