Posted on 06/08/2015 4:48:07 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
Trump said the Republicans are pushing the deal because “they don’t understand” the topic and “they’re making a mistake.”
“It’s because you have lobbyists lobbying for this thing, and you have lobbyists representing areas of industry, you have lobbyists representing countries,” Trump said.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/05/08/exclusive-donald-trump-disaster-trade-deal-empowers-americas-enemies-another-sign-country-is-going-to-hell/
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I didn’t bring up Marx first your comrade did.
They are built here, sold here. WTF is wrong with that? It employs American Workers, and it employed American workers to build the factories and the equipment...and it employs Americans to build many of the parts.
It generates tax benefits to local AMERICAN communities, and it provides a cost efficient choice to AMERICAN CONSUMERS. Your hatred that a single job in Asia or Europe was created just shows that you are an economic troglodyte - incredibly unsophisticated and simple and shallow.
you’ve argued MARX FOR YEARS on this forum....shame on you now for lying your ass off.
none of that matters dude....Reagan was in philosophy a free trader, a Milton Friedman conservative. That some countries had to be reigned in is not relevant, because I never ever ever ever ever said I liked flawed one sided deals. NEVER said that.
In theory, freer trade is better. That doesn’t mean I like every trade agreement. Not at all. Again, your intellectual weakness means you have to make idiotic assumptions about those who know more than you...and to impugn their motives.
Shame on you little econ populist liberal.
Fair enough, I may have been arguing about Marx but you and your Kowtowing gloBULList are following Marx. Big difference.
you’re still looking at the polaroid negative of reality today. With todays’ global economy and technology, protectionism is only the purview of union thugs...and you and CNN.
you’re still a troglodyte....way way way behind the times.
Dude? I post many many instances of Reagan's protectionism and you poo poo it. Your Chinese handlers aren't going to be happy with your lame rebuttal here.....
Really? do yo know the percent of the manufacturing work force is under union representation?
You are all over the board, first you say it doesn’t matter where they(American built BMWs) are sold and now you say taht benefits American consumers. You need to take a nap.
Being pro American is never behind the times. the whorish free traders can KMA.
Very little in the private sector, WHICH IS WHY THE UNION THUGS AGREE WITH YOU ON TRADE....THEY WANT IT BACK, AND THEY KNOW THAT ONLY PROTECTIONISM THAT SCREWS CONSUMERS WILL ALLOW OVER PRICE INCOMPETENT UNIONS TO COMPETE. YOU MAKE MY CASE FOR ME AND YOU'RE TOO EFFEN IGNORANT TO EVEN REALIZE IT.
Go away. In your little WW 1 bi plane of a brain you have no idea an F 16 is running circles around you, because you are not competent enough to see it. Debating you is like debating a spoiled estrogen driven low information teen girl.
So unions aren’t a problem; so why are we off shoring again? The factories we shut down now are overwhelmingly non union by your own admission. The list of excuses for justifying traitorous behavior is getting smaller.
I made the point that you agree with the union thugs on this one. And that is true. It is in fact the unions, and taxes, and regulations, that are driving jobs offshore. And/or to RED states. Duh. Think much? Wait, no need to answer.
That is why there are so few union jobs....but again, my point is that YOU and the THUGS agree...AND YOU DO PERIOD.
Game set match.....yet again.
Now there you've gone and done it - you've actually introduced a logical concept that would solve a lot of the problem. WTF are you thinking? Don't you know this is FR, where the intellectual morons at the kiddie table like to pretend they are scoring points by throwing around words like "free traitor" and so on? How DARE YOU bring logic and reason into this debate.
no, Marx was NOT a free trader...he wanted capitalist countries to exercise free trade because he said it would destroy them. Again, someone who’s NEVER BEEN RIGHT about economics EVER. NEVER EVER.
I didn’t see where CNN attempted to define “trade deficit” in his own words. Did he ever?
Not to me he didn’t. He won’t.
you mean, he can’t.......
Correct. He’s a bomb thrower and I suspect not even a single person. That’s my take from looking at his posting history.
He’s hard to follow, but if you look up:
“CringingNegativismNe”
You can find his posts and see how he’s more machine than man. The name itself caused me to be suspicious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.