Why are the moderators deleting Walker threads?

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/iowas-roast-and-ride-5-takeaways-118702.html?hp=t1_r ^ | june 7 | Katie Glueck

[JohnBrowdie]

this forum is becoming a mouthpiece for cruz.

[Nifster]

So you have been booted before

[Nifster]

No he is in the modern sense . His campaign higher ups are hard left.

He is Jeb in cowboy boots

[Nifster]

And so did Rand

[nuconvert]

You can “hold their feet to the fire” until there’s one left standing. Then it’s time to defeat Hillary

[Nifster]

Now that’s just plain funny

[Nifster]

That’s all well and good. The ricks tear int no reagan

[Nifster]

And has illegals all over everywhere. Looks a lot like SoCal. Gave illegals instate tuition.

[Nifster]

Ted said he voted for free trade. You can disagree with that.

You will have no one to vote for on your criteria.

Cruz never promised to not back free trade.

Bigger problem is the idea that bills are classified

[Nifster]

Perry has little to do with the economic health of Texas. The legislature made that possible

[Mycroft Holmes]

Changing the given titles is another reason for deleting a thread (can't search properly for duplicates). The title that this thread refers to should be "Iowa's 'Roast and Ride': 5 takeaways". If it gets pulled, that's why.

	Freedom ≠ Free Stuff☭
	I, for one, welcome our new Cybernetic Overlords /.
Mash Dobbshead® for HTML, bop Hello_Cthlhu for XAMPP

[kinsman redeemer]

LOL -
That’s what I thought, too.

[House Atreides]

this forum is becoming a mouthpiece for cruz.
***************************************************************************************
I started to do a search of your recent postings and this was the most recent one (at the time I did the search):

“name three REAL accomplishments for ted cruz.

just three.”

And that post wasn’t directed as any kind of anti-Walker or pro-Cruz comment—it just came out of the blue. So I think perhaps you’re seeing things that aren’t there. My advice for you is to “Lighten up, Francis.”.

[House Atreides]

yep. what time was that? I think we have a particular mod that is out of hand
*****************************************************************************************************
Ahh...click on the link the (perfectly reasonable) explanation is right there. Reading comprehension is your friend.

[shibumi]

Here -

Happy now?

[Mycroft Holmes]

A better question is why do idiots post huge pictures and ruin the thread for iPad users?

It's a target rich environment...

Screen Sizes

With the proliferation of display devices, screens now come in a wide variety of sizes and aspect ratios. The image below illustrates the range of screens possible. Differing aspect ratios are shown on the diagonal lines with the ratio in circles towards the lower right.

Given the wide variation in screen resolution and size when we step from mobi to fondleslab to display to HDTV it is lunacy to specify screen position in term of pixels. There is no way to know what sized screen you are imaging to so it is best to reference screen sizes and positions in percentages instead. The resulting size is the percentage of the width (or height) of the enclosing container. This is most useful when specifying positions and sizes of tables and images. The HTML for the image above looks like:

<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Vector_Video_Standards5.svg" width="95%">

The width="95%" part sets the image width to 95% of the width of the enclosing container. We leave the height unspecified so that the computer will figure out the correct value so as not to distort the image. If you wish to distort the image you may specify a height as well.

Things that are text related, such as the whitespace around a paragraph or header and text sizes are best specified in em. One em was originally the width of an M in the current font. In a multi-lingual world where not all alphabets have an M in them, the meaning has evolved to mean the height of the current font. As the user changes the magnification on a page the size of an em changes with it. This produces a pleasing scaled effect to the eye not possible when spacing objects in pixels.

Other unit values available are in inch, cm centimeter, mm millimeter, ex x-height of a font (x-height is usually about half the font-size), pt point - 1/72 of an inch, pc pica - 12 points and px pixels - a single dot on the screen. If no units are specified pixels are used by default. Best results across the broad spectrum of displays are achieved by exclusively using em and percent to specify size and distance. Try not to do anything else.

[bert]

Yes but you forgot about Perry that he yada yada yada

[joe fonebone]

he is among the top 10 vote missers in the senate..

no thanks

[fieldmarshaldj]

La Raza Rick ? Whut ?

[fieldmarshaldj]

Cruz or we all lose.