Posted on 06/06/2015 7:27:07 PM PDT by Morgana
Here are five times where Glass felt the "19 Kids and Counting" parents were trying to hide the truth, according to Radar Online.
Michelle Duggar volunteers too much information Watch closely the entire interview and one would easily note that Michelle is constantly giving away more information than required. This, according to Glass, is a form of deception.
Michelle Duggar looks for reassurance All throughout the interview Michelle looks at her husband for reassurance. This and the fact that she gives away too much information are hints that the whole thing was rehearsed, believes Glass.
"Michelle Duggar it is loaded with deception. She tells too much story and embellishment and gives too much away. It is such complete deception," Glass told Radar Online.
Fake tears "Michelle pretends she is crying but there are no tears. No one cries without tears. She is sobbing and there are absolutely no tears! Another thing that struck me is that Michelle wiped one eye at a time. You don't cry one eye at a time."
(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.co.in ...
What would you if you found out that a 14 year old neighbor molested four of your daughters when they were four or five years old?
Yeah. Sure. OK.
Why is any act wrong at all?
You find yourself inexorably at God’s throne with such questions. Otherwise it is your own private opinion.
The boy is/was down a path that could lead prison and or much worse. The Duggars aren’t some quiet family in middle America. They are celebrities on TV and they make money off of having as many kids as they can. Dirt and mud slinging comes with a TV income. They kept it quiet...But people like to go fishing into other peoples business.
“But his kids dont deserve this.”
Why did Anna marry a child sexual molester? Did she not think of her kids when she married him? “oh but he won’t hurt my/our kids” Stupid girl! He hurt his sisters, cousin and probably more to come. There is reason to believe he would hurt his own children.
Some people never learn.
Take a look at this clip from the show. Tell me what you think. I was shocked!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVjRiQw9KLw
do you think this is proper?”
NO. Very Creepy. What is he trying to prove around his kids? Especially now that we know about the son. I never watched the show, but I didn't think they did bad on the Megan Kelly interview. But this clip, lets me know something else is going on in this family. The father is a loser.
I do not subscribe to your beliefs. Therefore, your proseletyzing is wasted on me. Find another mark.
There is no juvenile criminal record and so it is not protected.
BTW- in this country, we prosecute lots of 15 and 16 year olds as adults.
They wear their clothes for swimming....interesting to hear the older girls comment why they don’t wear swim suits.....
I get that everyone else is bad but not us take about this family....there are certain things I’m looking for and it does have markers for cultish like issues....
The girls actually sound typical of those who repeat canned answers who follow cult teachings and they believe what they are saying....but then their parents do have a right to instill their beliefs to their children.
The issues really are legality issues no matter if you like or dislike how they’re raising their children.
They wouldn’t be considered to me as mainstream by any means.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaMcs8Kg5RM
Please get the story straight.
Now you’re claiming he “molested four daughters when they were four or five years old.”
Oh I have zero worry that you won’t meet up with the same God that forced me to turn around, the God whose faith founded America as well as it did.
Zero worry.
I am only warning ahead of time. Reject it, your funeral not mine!
Yea “gross”. That is a good “Christian” family with good morals too!
Most Christians I have spoken to said their Christian parents would have never done anything like that, nor would they, and they consider themselves more “progressive” than their parents.
Among them you
You sure do have it all figured out.
I don’t think it is unreasonable to say that the Media consumers and Duggar haters are pro-incest and child molestation.
The reason we have privacy laws surrounding these kinds of incidents is to encourage rather than discourage the reporting of the crime.
The victims have been re victimized.
All the histrionics but Bill Clinton can still go to pedophile island and do what he wants.
Regardless of the Christian sincerity of the Duggars— which so many Gods on this thread pretend to be in a position to judge— the arguments are for pure evil.
The duggars represent Conservative Christianity so just like the burning of Palin’s church with women and children inside and the shooting at the FRC where victims were to be compelled to eat Chick fil a sandwiches as they lay dying, the Duggars must be symbolically annihilated. Their silence must be assured so good people like the Clintons can continue to serve us all.
This thread is shocking but enlightening.
There are some really threatened and angry people on this board and their virtual stoning of the Duggars has more to it than just the facts of the case.
I’m not a fan of this family.
But, now visit the actual episode, which I found right here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XGMm-f53wk
Go to the 6:17 mark.
He’s telling her to bend her knees while she swings the club. There’s nothing dirty about that, except in the minds of the people who took that video and twisted it.
God, who has it all figured out, has vouchsafed love to all believers, but hate to those who (as all of us) in the beginning hated Him and then never repented.
What I wonder about is how many people think at last they can hide behind the Duggars at the Great White Throne?
Well, a couple of them gave an answer to the question.
I’m not sure I’m buying it, though. lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.