Posted on 06/06/2015 7:27:07 PM PDT by Morgana
Here are five times where Glass felt the "19 Kids and Counting" parents were trying to hide the truth, according to Radar Online.
Michelle Duggar volunteers too much information – Watch closely the entire interview and one would easily note that Michelle is constantly giving away more information than required. This, according to Glass, is a form of deception.
Michelle Duggar looks for reassurance – All throughout the interview Michelle looks at her husband for reassurance. This and the fact that she gives away too much information are hints that the whole thing was rehearsed, believes Glass.
"Michelle Duggar it is loaded with deception. She tells too much story and embellishment and gives too much away. It is such complete deception," Glass told Radar Online.
Fake tears – "Michelle pretends she is crying but there are no tears. No one cries without tears. She is sobbing and there are absolutely no tears! Another thing that struck me is that Michelle wiped one eye at a time. You don't cry one eye at a time."
(Excerpt) Read more at ibtimes.co.in ...
“My parents like to show their kiss. What the hell does that even mean?”
Dude I don’t know! I’m not sure I want to know!
In case you have not already seen this....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVjRiQw9KLw
Like al baby said “if they do that in public what do they do in private????”
I mean for real I can take Gomez kissing Morticia’s arm but I can not take that!!
I saw that too. There’s plenty of fodder for us to chase them off for good.
speaking of Gomez and Morticia.....
watch this...see if brings back memories. Compare that with the Duggars golf game. (everyone else see post #261 )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMSZDtPHJiM
I much much much prefer Gomez and Morticia!
There are plenty of perverts in the world. Liberal and conservative. Pagan and christian. Gay and straight. You get the idea.
I’ve seen a lot of eye-opening things these past few days...
What exactly are the two of you insinuating here?
The only people making things up are YOU.
How dare you accuse me of justifying or excusing the behavior. I've stated repeatedly that it is DISTURBING ENOUGH - without the misinformation some of you are spreading. You don't care at all about those girls.
Unfortunately for you, I have the right to voice an opinion that you may not necessarily like. I apologize in advance for bothering you in the future.
Oh, don’t hand me that.
I’m not insinuating a thing. I’m saying it flat out.
You’re trying to manipulate the facts and create your own, right down to changing Josh’s age and trying to make him the “girl” who was in tears.
And with that being said, they never have any other "expert" that just might have a differing opinion?
I guess if one has an agenda, there's no sense in presenting someone who just might have a logical explanation into the topic being discussed
Oh, God, this gets worse and worse.
My hope is that those girls-—and the boys, too-—have their eyes opened and come to the realization that Jesus exists outside that crazy cult.
Kids, wake up and get out of there.
For a long time, Morgana, I’ve agreed with you on the anti-pornography threads.
Once, when I was running the homeschool ping list temporarily, you insisted that I ping to every single one of your anti-porn threads.
And now here you are, repeatedly posting the same twisted, “pornified” version of what was nothing more than two people at a mini-golf game. Every time I post a link to the actual episode - in which it’s clear to anyone (whose mind isn’t in the gutter) that the parents’ behavior in it is innocent - you ignore it and continue posting the pornified version, pointing it out to everyone, and laughing about it.
And THAT from a person who claims to be anti-porn.
No, I just want to know the truth. It is hard to know what to believe anymore.
Offering too much information is often an indication of deception.
Let me walk you through this slowly:
You wrote that his behavior was “INITIALLY discovered when one of the girls went to her father in tears.”
The PARENTS said that he was the one who went crying to them.
The DAUGHTERS said that he was the one who went to the parents.
Read the POLICE REPORT on page 13:
http://imgur.com/a/zqPMi#13
The names are blacked out. According to the parents AND two daughters, it was the boy himself who went to the parents.
LOOK AT PAGE 13 in the police report again.
It says the parents found out in MARCH 2002.
He was born on March 3, 1988:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Duggar
That means he had JUST TURNED 14 THAT MONTH, just as the parents said.
As I wrote in my post, that IMPLIES that he was still 13 (or possibly younger) when the behavior started.
DO. YOU. UNDERSTAND. NOW?
I do understand that.
I personally believe the Duggars’ problems are rooted in the Gothard cult they follow. It’s regrettable that they chose a doctrine which teaches them they have to work their way to God by way of extreme, restrictive, manmade rules. It seems the kids are the ones who are paying the price.
Well, Jimbo, we ALL have the "right" to voice an opinion that others may not necessarily like.
But what you posted was a bit more than just "voicing an opinion."
In reply to another poster, you made an insinuation.
I’m not going to repeat my prior post to you, but you’re free to refer back to it.
And if you expect to be treated with civility yourself, put a lid on the screaming.
Let’s not bicker over who insinuated who. I think its safe to say the insinuation has been mutual to both sides.
My, how emotionally fragile you are, over a FEW WORDS in all-caps for emphasis.
You didn’t look at the police report. You didn’t follow my post. You don’t want to read for yourself.
This is a waste of my time.
I didn’t make an insinuation. That’s it. Conversation over. This is a waste of my time.
LOL. You can’t dismiss me from the table, Dad(Mom?). I’m not done with my dinner yet.
And if you were not such a shallow Hal(Helen?), you would notice that I did not insinuate that you had insinuated anyone personally. I apologize for the misinsinuation on my part. I will try to be more clear in the future and make my insinuations more like accusations, so you can tell the difference.
Relax and have a drink.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.