Skip to comments.
Fluoridation: Don't Let the Poisonmongers Scare You
Quackwatch ^
| March 30, 2013
| Bob Sprague, Mary Bernhardt, Stephen Barrett, M.D.
Posted on 06/04/2015 5:13:51 AM PDT by rickmichaels
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: rickmichaels
Urban people who drink fluoridated water vs rural people who don’t.
2
posted on
06/04/2015 5:15:50 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: rickmichaels
There’s already fluoridated toothpaste to address this.
To: rickmichaels
4
posted on
06/04/2015 5:26:37 AM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: rickmichaels
"
I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion, and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids"United States Air Force Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper
5
posted on
06/04/2015 5:27:12 AM PDT
by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: rickmichaels
How about we decide what to put in our own drinking water?
6
posted on
06/04/2015 5:30:14 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: rickmichaels
Fluoride is great when used topically. Not so great when ingested. Actually, too much fluoride consumption can cause even worse problems.
Dental Fluorosis.
Higher doses than recommended can actually weaken teeth, bones, and ligaments, cause muscle weakness, and nerve problems. The safe level is about 20mg/day.
FLUORIDE: Uses, Side Effects, & Safety
7
posted on
06/04/2015 5:37:20 AM PDT
by
IYAS9YAS
(Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
To: cripplecreek
If you want fluoride in your water, you should purchase bottled water with fluoride in it.
If you do not want fluoride in your water, you should not have it forced on you by having it in your public drinking water.
Are we no longer a free people?
8
posted on
06/04/2015 5:37:57 AM PDT
by
Oak Grove
(H)
To: rickmichaels
But many others receive public water supplies that are not fluoridatedthanks largely to the efforts of poisonmongers Or maybe the people who manage these public water systems don't want to incur additional operating costs - costs which they would need pass on to the consumer in the form of higher water rates.
9
posted on
06/04/2015 5:38:04 AM PDT
by
WayneS
To: IYAS9YAS
10
posted on
06/04/2015 5:38:34 AM PDT
by
OKSooner
(Chamberlain at least loved his country, please don't insult his memory by comparing him to 0.)
To: Dr. Sivana
Why don’t we start with our gas tanks first?
11
posted on
06/04/2015 5:39:28 AM PDT
by
Corey Ohlis
(Visualize Swirled Peas)
To: Oak Grove
I’ve never lived anywhere with fluoridated water and I still have all my teeth at 50 years old. Hell I even have my wisdom teeth.
12
posted on
06/04/2015 5:40:12 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: Dr. Sivana
You can already buy water that is not fluoridated.
To: katana
My first thought upon reading the title.
14
posted on
06/04/2015 5:42:48 AM PDT
by
SpeakerToAnimals
(I hope to earn a name in battle)
To: Corey Ohlis
Why dont we start with our gas tanks first?
No reason why we can't do both! And I'm no libertarian, but common sense is common sense.
15
posted on
06/04/2015 5:43:25 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: IYAS9YAS
The EPA lists an MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) for Flouride of 4 mg/L (ppm).
Here is the exact text from the EPA's list of: Potential health effects from long-term exposure above the MCL for Flouride.
"Possible Bone disease (pain and tenderness of the bones); children may get mottled teeth."
16
posted on
06/04/2015 5:46:12 AM PDT
by
WayneS
To: Oak Grove
If you want fluoride in your water, you should purchase bottled water with fluoride in it. Exactly!
17
posted on
06/04/2015 5:46:55 AM PDT
by
WayneS
To: rickmichaels
The antis' most persuasive argument, both to legislators and to the general public, is to call for a public vote. On the surface, this appears to be the democratic way to settle the issue. But the antis are dealing from a stacked deck. First, the people who need fluoridation the mostthe childrendo not vote..
This guy used both the "my opponenst act like Hitler" argument and the "will somebody PLEEEEAAAASE think of the children" argument to bolster his case.
That makes him a two-time loser.
18
posted on
06/04/2015 5:49:11 AM PDT
by
WayneS
To: WayneS
And, on top of that, he used the "people are too stupid to know what's best for them so they need to let ME and other smart people decide what's best for them" argument...
Second, it is not difficult to confuse voters by flooding the community with scare propaganda. Average citizens do not have the educational background to sort out claim and counterclaim or to judge which "authorities" to believe.
That's three strikes. He is OUT and his side loses.
19
posted on
06/04/2015 5:51:42 AM PDT
by
WayneS
To: AppyPappy
You can already buy water that is not fluoridated.
You cannot live in a house (in most jurisdictions) that is not connected to city water if available. So, we are ordered to buy flouride.
For the record, my children spent there first years mostly in a house with a well and no flouride (other than what occurs naturally). They have one cavity among the three of them (ages 6 through 14). My wife as a teen went to a dentist who was instrumental in getting flouride added to their Canadian jurisdiction. She had zero cavities, and the dentist told her that the flouride was responsible! She was too Canadian to tell him they lived out of the city and had non-flouridated well water. I grew up with flouridated water, and wound up with plenty of cavities, probably more due to eating sweets than anything. Nowhere in the article does the author address concern about long term damage to kidneys or bones, which would not have been looked at in those early studies that focused on teeth.
Adding toothpaste to the mix puts the range over the 1 part per million. The condescending tone in the article that experts have to decide for all of us is insulting, and has led to ObamaLunch and Obamacare.
This is not my be all and end all issue, and I appreciate that the decisions are largely made at the local level, but if the vote were put up in my jurisdiction, I would say "No flouride added to the water".
20
posted on
06/04/2015 5:52:25 AM PDT
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson