It indicates no such thing. You read a lot into the Wikipedia article, which states:
"Additionally, Apple also holds several patents related to the implementation of multi-touch in user interfaces,[25] however the legitimacy of some patents has been disputed.[26] Apple additionally attempted to register "Multi-touch" as a trademark in the United States—however its request was denied by the United States Patent and Trademark Office because it considered the term generic.[27]"
Apple's patents were challenged in the lawsuit Apple brought against Samsung. Samsung claimed the patent wasn't valid and also challenged it by Samsung with the FTC. Both venues denied the validity of Samsung's challenges. Now Samsung is appealing, but those appeals are based on errors of law, not factual issues. The factual issues were decided by the jury in one case, and by the entire FTC board in the other. Sorry. BZZZT! Challenging the validity of a patent in trial is SOP. Means nothing. Samsung brought up the same issues you bring up and Apple won. YOU lose.
I just don't have the heart to keep doing this to you.
You have no case and you are doing nothing to me. You do it to yourself, Diogenes.
You must think you are arguing in a forum where people have the utmost respect for Judges, Juries and Lawyers. I assure you this is not the case. If you read enough of my posting history, you will discover much of it to be an endless criticism of modern legal methodology and people.
Proof that you can win in court is proof of nothing more than what most conservatives already know; The legal system is a mess, riven with abuse and privilege, and has not a whole lot to do with what is the objective truth.
In the words of Shania Twain, "That don't impress me much."
You have no case and you are doing nothing to me.
That's the spirit! :)