You must think you are arguing in a forum where people have the utmost respect for Judges, Juries and Lawyers. I assure you this is not the case. If you read enough of my posting history, you will discover much of it to be an endless criticism of modern legal methodology and people.
Proof that you can win in court is proof of nothing more than what most conservatives already know; The legal system is a mess, riven with abuse and privilege, and has not a whole lot to do with what is the objective truth.
In the words of Shania Twain, "That don't impress me much."
You have no case and you are doing nothing to me.
That's the spirit! :)
WOW! You are quoting Shania Twain? More proof of your membership in the low information group. Frankly, our jury system does a pretty damn good job of getting things right. I pity you if you think it doesn't. I trust a juries far more than I trust the judges. The wisdom of juries are the cornerstone of our entire system. Conservatives know this. Your thinking they doubt this makes me wonder at your claim to be a conservative.
As to your insulting ". . . insect" remark and its effect on me. My ego is not effected in the least by your little efforts to wound me. I am so respected in my county I was appointed as the foreman of the first Criminal Grand Jury in our area in 25 years by a panel of Superior Court Judges. I sat in that position for one year. Again, I do know something about what I am talking about. We were not a "ham sandwich Grand Jury."
The County DA so respected our panel's judgement that he asked us to sit as a petit jury on a murder case in which they were not certain they had enough evidence to arrest the suspect. For six weeks, the DA had me sit as the judge in the case, ruling on evidence, admissibility of witnesses, etc., as they presented their case, while the DA acted as prosecutor and another Assistant DA acted for the defense, making objections. After they finished the case for the prosecution, they rested. no case for the defense was presented. We found they did not prove their case for conviction. I, however, wrote an alternative theory for them to investigate that DID result in an arrest and conviction three years later. I am not any kind of "insect" or someone of no consequence.
Frankly, Diogenes, it is YOU who is not impressive at all.