Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cop charged with murder of motorist after jarring video surfaces
NY Post ^ | 4/7/15 | By Associated Press

Posted on 04/07/2015 4:24:56 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda

Cop charged with murder of motorist after jarring video surfaces

CHARLESTON, S.C. — A white South Carolina police officer has been charged with murder in the shooting death of a black motorist after a traffic stop. North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey told a hastily called news conference that city Patrolman Michael Thomas Slager was arrested and charged Tuesday after law enforcement officials saw a video of the shooting following a Saturday traffic stop. Authorities say the victim, 50-year-old Walter Lamer Scott of Charleston, was shot after the officer already hit him with a stun gun.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: banglist; cops; donutwatch; leo; policeshooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Here’s a longer video showing the cop picking up the stun gun and dropping it by the body. This cop is mince meat. You stop the guy for a broken tail light and you shoot him dead while he is running away with his back turned and then you try to plant evidence? Goood bye.

http://www.thestate.com/news/local/crime/article17779277.html


21 posted on 04/07/2015 4:43:51 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 15 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dware

Yep, I could see a jury finding first degree murder or manslaughter. Clearly the criminal in what we see was wearing blue.


22 posted on 04/07/2015 4:44:33 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

A few details:

1) The typical police Taser comes in two models, one with a 15 foot range, and the other with a 25 foot range.

2) Police Tasers typically have counters on them that show how often the probes have been fired, and how many (completed circuit) electrical shocks have been used. (Multiple shocks can go through the same probes.)

3) Notice how the officer is still yelling commands at the man either incapacitated or perhaps already dead. This is a bizarre phenomenon often done by police for some arcane legal reason. It is often seen as police yelling “stop resisting!” at someone who is fully cooperative.

I suspect it is to create a false impression among witnesses that the person under control actually was resisting, even if they were incapacitated or dead, along the lines of a bully using one of his victim’s own hands to hit the victim, while yelling, “Stop hitting yourself!”


23 posted on 04/07/2015 4:44:39 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The worry for what could happen ended when Scott dropped the stun gun and ran. At that point he could not be reasonably considered dangerous. Rather than give chase the cop executed him, likely as revenge for the scuffle.

When a cop murders someone, I sure hope the city would treat the family with deference.


24 posted on 04/07/2015 4:44:59 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

For a private citizen in the state of Washington, if the guy had grabbed and stolen a taser (or item of similar worth) from the citizen it would be a justifiable shoot. (From the legal stand point, but not what I would choose to do). I’m not so sure a cop could though. (The law is more restrictive on cops to use their weapon).

But if the taser was dropped by the guy and he was running away, as appears in this case if the cop had to go back and pick up the taser, it would be murder.


25 posted on 04/07/2015 4:45:28 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

A picture of the man who died.

https://mgtvwate.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/ht_walter_lamer_scott_02_jc_150407_4x3_992.jpg


26 posted on 04/07/2015 4:46:52 PM PDT by MeganC (You can ignore reality, but reality won't ignore you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

The video shows no fight, no weapon in the victim’s hands, and the cop unloading his weapon calmly from a distance into the victim’s back. It’s murder, regardless of whether the shooter is a cop or not.


27 posted on 04/07/2015 4:47:23 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dware

.


28 posted on 04/07/2015 4:47:28 PM PDT by metesky (My investment program is holding steady @ $0.05 cents a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dinodino

what you don’t see is the physical altercation between cop and perp prior to the shooting!!


29 posted on 04/07/2015 4:50:04 PM PDT by Paul46360 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dware

Cops are allowed more reasons for using deadly force than we mere civilians. Not saying the shooting was justified, just saying that cops don’t need to perceive any imminent threat to themselves or others in order to justify use of deadly force.


30 posted on 04/07/2015 4:50:04 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dware

the cop was no longer in imminent danger

Not enough info here, but if the guy had the cop’s tazer the shooting might have been justified as the cop has a duty to try to protect not just himself, but others. If the guy didn’t have a weapon than its a different story.


31 posted on 04/07/2015 4:50:08 PM PDT by logic101.net (If libs believe in Darwin and natural selection why do they get hacked off when it happens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

that video was so unclear....nothing could be determined...


32 posted on 04/07/2015 4:50:38 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

I don’t need to see it! The victim’s weapon (apparently, the Taser) was on the ground *before* he started running. The cop stood there, shot him in the back until he dropped, and then walked over and evidently put the Taser with the victim.

MURDER 1.


33 posted on 04/07/2015 4:51:45 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

So the deceased dropped the stun gun (perhaps grabbing the wires just to try to break the circuit?), and the cop shoots him, then plants the gun on him? If that is what happened, yeah - this cop should spent the rest of his life in prison in general population.

The one thing that came out of Ferguson and Obama’s national police policy thing that I tend to agree with is body cams for the cops. MAYBE it will keep everybody a bit more honest.


34 posted on 04/07/2015 4:51:51 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: logic101.net

The guy didn’t have the taser, but the cop did go back and get it, and then drop it next to the body.


35 posted on 04/07/2015 4:52:07 PM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dinodino
I don't dis-agree..just making a statement.

BUT WHEN will civilians just S T O P when told to???

36 posted on 04/07/2015 4:53:21 PM PDT by Paul46360 (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“just saying that cops don’t need to perceive any imminent threat to themselves or others in order to justify use of deadly force”.

What?


37 posted on 04/07/2015 4:54:22 PM PDT by Rick66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

“That justifies shooting an unarmed man in the back as he was running away?”

Just to clarify - so, if you can open up a little distance and outrun the cop, you can do anything first?


38 posted on 04/07/2015 4:54:35 PM PDT by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: aft_lizard; MeganC

See my reply #13.


39 posted on 04/07/2015 4:55:41 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra (Don't touch that thing Don't let anybody touch that thing!I'm a Doctor and I won't touch that thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

The big $$$$ lawsuit is not going to do him any good.


40 posted on 04/07/2015 4:55:54 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson