That's one theory. Another is that I believe erroneous ideas and assertions need to be challenged because it serves the best interest of our society. (And therefore the best interest of me and mine.)
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."
And where is the easiest stage of intervention? At the level of ideas. When you have to fight masses determined to act on those ideas, the effort just gets harder.
As I have said, we could have stopped Hitler at the Sudetenland. Because we didn't, we ended up having to stop him at the Battle of the Bulge. It would have been easier still to stop him when he was preaching Nazisism and before he came into power.
I Object to your ideas as advocated on this thread and on other threads. It is just a quirk that it is you who happens to be advocating them. Or perhaps not.
You are decidedly Libertarian in outlook, and Libertarianism is just the lesser evil cousin of Liberalism.
And there’s very few things in this world more objectionable than the simple truth.
Ain't that the truth.
Wow two post and you’ve already run to Hitler. That’s the fastest Godwin I’ve seen in a while.
And note, you haven’t actually objected to ANY of my ideas. You’re only going for personal attacks. Because you’re a flame war junky.
I think you have your dates mixed up. Hitler took the Sudetenland in 1938. He had been in power for five years already.