/src on/Can't wait for the NHTSA to mandate this./src off/
1 posted on
03/24/2015 12:52:24 PM PDT by
C19fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: C19fan
2 posted on
03/24/2015 12:52:58 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
To: C19fan
I believe that this is likely to cause quite a few rear-end collisions.
To: C19fan
I see a field day for attorneys on so many fronts its staggering....
To: C19fan
I’m surprised it’s taken this long.
To: C19fan
6 posted on
03/24/2015 12:54:35 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: C19fan
Until the first car that gets in an accident because it could not accelerate. They should crowd source their ideas before they announce them.
To: C19fan
The cops and prosecutors will never allow a huge stream of income from speeding tickets go away.
To: C19fan
OK, so I am on a road with a speed limit of 60. I want to pass a car that is fluctuating between 55-58.
This is a disaster waiting to happen.
9 posted on
03/24/2015 12:56:27 PM PDT by
Gamecock
("The Christian who has stopped repenting has stopped growing." A.W. Pink)
To: C19fan
Has Ford ever steered us wrong before?
10 posted on
03/24/2015 12:56:35 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(It takes a gun to feed a village (and an AK 47 to defend it).)
To: C19fan
In some areas you can be ticket for impeding traffic even if you are driving the speed limit.
11 posted on
03/24/2015 12:56:54 PM PDT by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: C19fan
It is just a matter of time before the insurance industry butts their nose in and demands that ALL cars have this technology. But the cities dependent on traffic ticket revenues are gonna hate it.
12 posted on
03/24/2015 12:57:18 PM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: C19fan
computers can not think out of the box...safe drivers must ..
13 posted on
03/24/2015 12:57:33 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: C19fan
I remember the good ol’ days before eighteen wheelers had governors that limited their speed. You never found yourself behind two semis for ten minutes while one tried to pass the other.
15 posted on
03/24/2015 12:58:01 PM PDT by
optiguy
(If government is the answer, it was a stupid question.)
To: C19fan; Nachum; Slings and Arrows; GeronL
16 posted on
03/24/2015 12:58:43 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: C19fan
17 posted on
03/24/2015 12:58:48 PM PDT by
SuperSonic
(If I had a dog it would look like the one Obama ate!)
To: C19fan
this will CAUSE accidents by preventing needed speed in accident avoidance.
Also nobody will buy this “bib mommy” BS. (perhaps the European eunuchs or NYC effetes)
18 posted on
03/24/2015 12:59:06 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: C19fan
On the freeways I drive here in SOCAL, if you drive the speed limit (generally 65mph), you’ll get run over.
To: C19fan
The local mall has 5mph signs on its loop road — nobody goes less than 35mph.
To: C19fan
If these pick up signals (wifi?) from the traffic sign posts, could those same signposts be driven by the police to slow the speed limit to 5 miles per hour in the incidence of a chase?
23 posted on
03/24/2015 1:01:00 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
To: C19fan
Most truck fleets have/use this already. It’s how we help manage our fuel costs. But if you keep buying cars with carburetors, you should be OK.
25 posted on
03/24/2015 1:01:18 PM PDT by
showme_the_Glory
((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
