Posted on 02/01/2015 5:29:34 PM PST by JOHN ADAMS
Am I the only person watching this "football game" (which is actually a good football game) annoyed by these annoying lectures, masquerading as commercials, about how powerful, capable, independent and valuable women are, so we barbaric men shouldn't devalue them, disrespect them (not actually a word) or hit them? Is this really what we need to be told while we're trying to just watch a ball game? I know the rest of the culture insists on this, but aren't men the primary clientele of the NFL? Why does the NFL have to subject us to this nonsense?
If you tuned out halfway, then you missed this PC demographic commercial...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpi5UXuoCzQ
And I didn’t say you did agree
I said why even repeat it on a conservative site
It’ has the same veracity of Hands Up
I noted that of those in the room with me, the ones who hooted and howled and approved the most were the angry leftist females who have a chip on their shoulder and see the world through the lens of gender conflict.
I quickly saw the subtext and was sorta grossed out by it. It was anti-family and thus ultimately anti-civilization.
I thought maybe EXLAX was going to be a major sponsor
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, "disrespect" has been used as a verb since 1614.
Puritan divine and Cambridge don Joseph Hall wrote of the "two masters" passage of the Gospel: "If he love the one, he must disrespect the other."
Victorian novelist George Meredith wrote: "You will judge whether he disrespects me."
Thomas Paine wrote participially in "The Rights of Man" as follows: 'Reflecting how wretched was the condition of a disrespected man."
It is a perfectly good, direct and descriptive English verb.
I know. These leftists act as if the US is the most racist and sexist place on Earth while purposefully ignoring the obvious.
It’s capitalism, John, plain and simple.
Women are/were an unexploited market for the NFL. Note how they started making jerseys for the female form over the last few years.
MONEY.
And no, I have not read the rest of the thread, but unless the posts point to money as the reason, they are simply wrong. IMVHO.
Well, lets just say my night would be happy, not yours. (you should see me smiling right now)
Fine, maybe your hooker will represent you against the anti-male bias in the court system when it's your turn.
Well, look at all of the Freepers who have complained about the anti male bias of the family court system, or the school system that is shortchanging boys just at FR. Then, read some of this.
The Growing Demand for Prostitution
What Kind of Men Go to Prostitutes?
Secret Service Scandal: Why Men Buy Sex
1% of this money would be enough to help MRAs fight the bias that men are always complaining about.
Now tell me you don't understand my disgust.
Are they forcing men to patronize their services at gunpoint, and in doing so preventing men from supporting MRAs?
Do as I do; ignore them or channel surf while they’re on. Or, more challenging, think up counter ads to oppose them!
It’s a fundamental CHRISTIAN idea. Wives must submit to the leadership their husbands.
Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.