Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2015 9:20:32 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

I think what bothered me the most is that “CE” is now replacing “AD.” Can’t have “Anno Domini” in there anymore, now can we?


2 posted on 01/23/2015 9:23:06 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Second Century of the Common Era A.D.

Fixed it.

3 posted on 01/23/2015 9:23:13 AM PST by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
The Gospel of Mark has been discovered written on a tiny fragment of ancient papyrus, found within a mummy mask.

This sample is thought to date from before the year C.E. 90.

Well this more or less confirms what I read 30 years ago that Mark was the first Gospel written and that subsequent Gospels were basically expounding on Mark.

5 posted on 01/23/2015 9:28:14 AM PST by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Dingy Harry after reconstructive surgery?


7 posted on 01/23/2015 9:35:42 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is great news. Now maybe we can see if the text matches the current text. Is the missing verse there or if it is still missing? Is the order of the verses concurrent?........


9 posted on 01/23/2015 9:42:07 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Interesting article. It reminds me of a couple of books I read many years ago. The first is called “The First New Testament” by Estrada and White. I follows the discovery by a Spanish researcher who found what he claimed was part of the Gospel of Mark among some Qumran papyri. The fragment was dated to the middle of the first century. Although the book left the final confirmation up in the air, I don’t believe anyone has come up with an alternative explanation.

The other book was “Redating the New Testament” by John A.T. Robinson. Robinson’s main thrust was that one of the most momentous incidents of history, the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans, is not mentioned or even alluded to in the New Testament, leading to his contention that nearly the entire text of the NT was complete before 70 AD. Interesting because Robinson was quite a liberal scholar.

Thanks for posting this!


14 posted on 01/23/2015 10:51:50 AM PST by D_Idaho ("For we wrestle not against flesh and blood...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is awesome


15 posted on 01/23/2015 12:12:14 PM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

but that scholar bill maher says this is all bs?


16 posted on 01/23/2015 12:23:24 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I wonder how much of text is actually there. How many words or sentences have they found?
19 posted on 02/03/2015 2:18:18 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson