Skip to comments.
The NFL found 11 of the Patriots' 12 footballs were under-inflated by 2 pounds of air (PSI)
bostonherald.com ^
| Jan 21, 2015
| Jeff Howe
Posted on 01/21/2015 4:04:41 AM PST by Boston Blackie
The NFL is investigating whether the Patriots deflated footballs that were used in their AFC championship game victory over the Colts.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...
TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: deflatedballs; deflategate; deflatriots; newengland; nfl; patriots; searchfootballs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-192 next last
To: logi_cal869
How would filling with nitrogen do anything? The pressure is independent of the gas used for filling.
101
posted on
01/21/2015 6:19:40 AM PST
by
stremba
To: Fresh Wind
Exactly. That's what tires do, same would apply to footballs. Except, the NFL weighs the balls. Although PSI is subject to temperature, weight is not.
To: McGruff
Sore Losers. Your point about the officials being the first and last ones to touch the football is key. Has anything been posted to state that the original complaint about underinflated footballs came from the Colts? No dog in this fight, though.
The original report said the Patriots could lose draft picks. Big deal.
The precedent has been set for activity like this, and it happened to Sean Payton in Bountygate. If it was deliberate, a year's suspension.
103
posted on
01/21/2015 6:20:44 AM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: stremba; logi_cal869
Mythbuster did a show on Helium in footballs. A regulation NFL football will fly farther when filled with helium as opposed to compressed air at regulation pressure (13 psi).
BUSTED
Under the same amount of impulse force under the same atmospheric conditions, balls filled with helium showed no significant difference from balls filled with compressed air. It was also shown that, under the same impulse, both types of balls had the same initial velocity; since the helium-filled balls have less mass than the air-filled ones, the helium-filled balls have less inertia in flight: in fact, they may perform worse than air-filled balls over larger distances.
To: Colonel_Flagg
Has anything been posted to state that the original complaint about underinflated footballs came from the Colts?
Yes. From what I've read D'Qwell Jackson of the Colts got an interception and mentioned on the sideline that the ball didn't feel right. That's what started the whole thing.
To: 11th Commandment
Weighing the balls would prove nothing. The weight difference (assuming constant temperature measurements and that the underinflation is due to allowing gas to escape) would be on the order of 175 milligrams (about 0.006 oz.). I highly doubt that they are using a scale that can detect that weight difference in an object as heavy as a football.
106
posted on
01/21/2015 6:28:40 AM PST
by
stremba
To: kidd; sten
my mistake
those are gage pressures
P1=12.5 psi(gage) = 27.2 psi (absolute)
T1=80 F = 299.8 K
T2=20 F = 266.5 K
P1/T1 = P2/T2
P2 = P1 (T2/T1) = 27.2 psi x (266.5 K / 299.8 K) = 24.18 psi (absolute) = 9.5 psi (gage)
Conclusion: The cold temperature accounts for ALL of the underinflation.
107
posted on
01/21/2015 6:29:12 AM PST
by
kidd
To: mmichaels1970
Ok. Thank you for that. Not really sure how I missed it.
108
posted on
01/21/2015 6:30:08 AM PST
by
Colonel_Flagg
(You're either in or in the way.)
To: Travis McGee
Actually, there’s a rubber bladder inside the leather shell...the “stretch” factor should be practically non-existent.
I watched “How it’s made”, that’s how I know...
109
posted on
01/21/2015 6:30:41 AM PST
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: kidd
Physicist: Cold weather couldnt have deflated Patriots footballs
snip...
The chair of Boston Colleges physics department is shooting down claims that cold weather could be the reason some of the footballs used on the field Sunday evening during the New England Patriots 45-7 drubbing of the Indianapolis Colts may have been deflated. The pressure loss due to the temperature alone cannot be the issue in my mind, said BC physics professor Michael J. Naughton, after plugging temperature data into a formula that calculates pressure loss. If the footballs were notably lower pressure, then the only way it could have happened was if someone went in and stuck a needle in the ball and let two-thirds of the gas out, which means it is now up to the NFL to follow the chain of command but no logical physics can explain the kind of pressure loss theyre talking about.
To: SZonian
I watched How its made, thats how I know...
Nice!!!
To: Boston Blackie
Are not the footballs shared? I would think a basket with all the footballs in them during the game would be a fix. The ref picks a football out of the bin and gives it to either team while the game is going on.
To: Boston Blackie
113
posted on
01/21/2015 6:36:44 AM PST
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: showme_the_Glory
114
posted on
01/21/2015 6:37:09 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Boston Blackie
Were it critical to a team's, or player's, performance, the NFL would not allow teams to supply their own game balls. Nor would they allow a range of pressure for balls.
The fact that they specify a range of pressure and allow teams to supply their own balls at worst creates plenty of opportunity for some fudging to occur, and at best creates opportunity for post game controversy (as we're now witnessing).
If the NFL is truly interested in 'fairness,' the referees would supply all balls, each inflated to the exact same weight (no range). The balls would be monitored by sideline officials who verify that each meets specs every time one is put into play, even going so far to tweak their pressure as the temperature changes during the game.
Doing this would mean that Brady, Manning, Luck, et al would be playing with identical balls at any location and under any weather conditions.
To: Seattle Conservative
Thanks! Bump for later. Gotta go earn a buck! :)
116
posted on
01/21/2015 6:38:11 AM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Boston Blackie
=
117
posted on
01/21/2015 6:39:06 AM PST
by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: mmichaels1970
I did stay at a Holiday Inn once.
It would be disingenuous to pretend to be an “expert” on football construction when I’m anything but.
118
posted on
01/21/2015 6:39:33 AM PST
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: minnesota_bound
Are not the footballs shared?
Nope...kinda stupid isn't it?
I would think a basket with all the footballs in them during the game would be a fix.
To think of all the millions of dollars people involved in this game are paid, and you put that one out for free! Right on! I suspect your rule change will be implemented in the VERY near future.
To: kidd
The basis for your calculations is wrong. It was 51º at kick off time.
Also, is there some “magic math” to explain why, in the same environment, the Patriots’ balls were under inflated, while the Seahawks’ balls were not?
120
posted on
01/21/2015 6:42:38 AM PST
by
randita
(Obama entrusted the transformation of the best healthcare system in the world to a scam artist.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-192 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson